Which era was the best for you.

Topics related to Second Age
davenenn
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 12:57 am

Re: Which era was the best for you.

Post by davenenn »

UO:R easily. I didn't play T2A for very long, but it was still fun even though I was a noob running around confused, but UO:R really brought alot of improvements to the overall game imo. Obviously trammel = felucia without pvp was a bad thing, but almost everything else they added was great. Factions were a blast, crafting improvements, more housing area, diverse builds, etc.

Clx
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 2:08 am

Re: Which era was the best for you.

Post by Clx »

t2a for the community (ie before trammel ruined everything)
AOS PvP/end-game (after the PvP balance patch in 2004 and without trammel/neon crap)

Don't understand this talk about Felucca being active in UO:R - it picked up a lot post p16 and into AoS on every shard I played, because there was a reason for new players to actually venture there, something that was missing throughout UO:R.

Post Reply