Hmmm

Topics related to Second Age
User avatar
Marvel
Posts: 40
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 9:57 pm
Location: Indiana, USA

Hmmm

Post by Marvel »

I just saw that the server showed 222 Online and that got me thinking, back when we all played OSI UO, how many people could a typical server handle?


This shard appears to me to be growing so maybe we'll have a population that was close to one of the UO servers back in the day?

User avatar
inkognito
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 1907
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:10 am

Re: Hmmm

Post by inkognito »

Great question. I was on one time during a holiday season during osi second age era and holy hell. Seemed like every bank, dungeon, and graveyard had 40 people rolling thru it.
Maybe one of the gms know the exact highest ip count we hit here. But never did it rival osi in era haydays.
Image
Li Meiyang wrote:Banned for"trashtalking for no reason"
Inkognito was flamebaiting me with all the "no" stuff.WTF is that?
Inkognito●GM Provocation

Eastwood
Posts: 428
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 6:52 pm
Location: United States

Re: Hmmm

Post by Eastwood »

I remember on OSI sharing the minoc mine with at least half a dozen people, the Britain northern mine with the same. The bone mage room having about that many people all shooting corp por the exact moment a skelly mage would spawn. The bone knight room being an awesome skill gain fest. And just going to the Britain crossroads and finding an epic field PVP battle of at least 50 people.

Based on our max characters online being 1000, I would guess an OSI shard had 2500 active players during prime time. Who knows, it was glorious though.
Catskills 97-99

User avatar
Robbbb
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 2067
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 10:51 pm

Re: Hmmm

Post by Robbbb »

The count shows characters online not actual people online. Most people here have 2 to 3 chars ok at once. On OSI, if I remeber correctly from an article I read long ago, a typical shard had about 30k people on it. Typical peak times were 6-10k people actually online at the same time. Off peak hours had 2-4k people on.

User avatar
Capitalist
Posts: 11567
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:39 pm

Re: Hmmm

Post by Capitalist »

Last free a hard I played averaged about 5k. It's not only OSI that can have that many people.
Denis the Menace wrote:Vega for me you are just exploiting the uosa system with your vanq charged spellreflect recall invis pink boobi pvp trammel style which never existed on osi, so stfu.
Jakob wrote:Regardless of douchebag, fair player or Vega.

Roser
UOSA Subscriber!
UOSA Subscriber!
Posts: 3367
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 12:01 am
Location: In your tree house with binoculars
Contact:

Re: Hmmm

Post by Roser »

Eastwood is bang on. Also remember that most people had only 1 account, so 2500 people online was really close to that many actual people playing at any given time. Here on UOSA almost everyone has 3 accounts, except for Vega (lololol sort of joking but probably not).

Robbbb the OSI server definitely did not have 30k people on a single server. I bet all my goldz Kaivan has the correct answer to this.
Image

User avatar
Marvel
Posts: 40
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 9:57 pm
Location: Indiana, USA

Re: Hmmm

Post by Marvel »

Oh wow... that's a lot of people.

Back then we didn't have mega servers (as far as i know of..) that could hold thousands and thousands of people at once so I didnt know what a typical server back then could hold.

User avatar
Boomland Jenkins
Second Age Staff
Second Age Staff
Posts: 1579
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 8:00 pm
Location: New York
Contact:

Re: Hmmm

Post by Boomland Jenkins »

Robbbb wrote:The count shows characters online not actual people online. Most people here have 2 to 3 chars ok at once. On OSI, if I remeber correctly from an article I read long ago, a typical shard had about 30k people on it. Typical peak times were 6-10k people actually online at the same time. Off peak hours had 2-4k people on.
This is actually rarely the case, if you do an !status check in IRC you'll see that it's never a 1:3 ratio, and rarely a 1:2 ratio and you must keep in mind that some households actually do have multiple people playing here. However, the general idea of the statement is true - the online count VS "real people" is not the same.

OSI's shards were broken into multiple servers ("server lines") to allow them to handle larger loads. I am not sure how the professional UO server's hardware of the late 1990s compares to the cheap of free shard UO of today.
Eat. Sleep. Ultima.

User avatar
nubnub
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 184
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2012 2:10 pm

Re: Hmmm

Post by nubnub »

Ahh server lines... I always hated those things (and so did my dial-up connection), especially folks that would run back/forth across server lines during fights.

Demetrius
Posts: 933
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 6:51 pm

Re: Hmmm

Post by Demetrius »

Ahhh Dial up connestions! The good ole days. Just as you were about to kill someone your connection would flake out on you and you would log back in dead! lol
"The secret to acting is to never let them catch you doing it"
-Marlon Brando

User avatar
Malaikat
Posts: 4533
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 10:32 am

Re: Hmmm

Post by Malaikat »

We pk'd from a comic book/hobby shop that had a bunch of networked pc's set up for LAN gaming and bonded DS-1 circuits for internet. So while you bastages were rocking 56k, we were among the small percentage with 3Mb/s
Save yourself the shame and embarrassment and just assume that if you can't understand me...you're the one who's retarded.
Budner wrote:Your sig lets everyone know what an arrogant prick you are.

User avatar
inkognito
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 1907
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:10 am

Re: Hmmm

Post by inkognito »

Elitist scum with their lightning speed 3Mb :lol:
Image
Li Meiyang wrote:Banned for"trashtalking for no reason"
Inkognito was flamebaiting me with all the "no" stuff.WTF is that?
Inkognito●GM Provocation

User avatar
Malaikat
Posts: 4533
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 10:32 am

Re: Hmmm

Post by Malaikat »

Hey, it was 53 times faster than most people had at the time!
Save yourself the shame and embarrassment and just assume that if you can't understand me...you're the one who's retarded.
Budner wrote:Your sig lets everyone know what an arrogant prick you are.

User avatar
Robbbb
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 2067
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 10:51 pm

Re: Hmmm

Post by Robbbb »

I also only ever played UO with 3mb DSL. I was accused of speed hacking many times! Used to love fighting multiple people at once!

The information I posted came from an old interview with a GM. At the peak UO had close to 400,000 members that played. If you spead that evenly around the shards at the time it comes out to 25-30k per shard. But obviously each shard had different levels. It just mentioned averages across the entire game.

If you really think about it, saying they had 2500 people online couldn't possibly be accurate. If you think about UOSA and when we had 800 uniques online it was still not even remotely CLOSE to OSI in terms of how many people you saw running around in the world and in every dungeon and bank. You could probably find 800 people in destard alone at one time with the bone wall and all LOL!

User avatar
inkognito
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 1907
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:10 am

Re: Hmmm

Post by inkognito »

I still remember when one of my best friends got dsl. It changed our game forever. Me and my buddies were over there every weekend. Packed up our whole rigs and set em up at his house. Hell our computers were at his house more often then our own. We could actually ride a f'ing horse!
Image
Li Meiyang wrote:Banned for"trashtalking for no reason"
Inkognito was flamebaiting me with all the "no" stuff.WTF is that?
Inkognito●GM Provocation

Post Reply