
however
ps: dumbest thread ever
You're delusional, bro. In case you didn't notice Alatar and I are very active feild fighters (Deacon..Sivrik). If you don't know this then YOU are the one not seen in game. We spent the last two days pk'ing the shit out of ppl and fighting mainly outnumbered with the exception of a few mYm fights.Homie wrote:Im always wondering about the people demanding such things and never be seen ingame. It seems that they only live here and writing essays instead bringin their asses (forgive me) out for gameplay![]()
however
ps: dumbest thread ever
Hm i might stop to think that if it were true. I was gone for over two months and just came back recently, and guess what? I saw NO new pvper's whatsoever, and the one's i do find run for the hills as soon as they get close to half hp.Eulogy wrote:Has anyone ever stopped to think that these events actually encourage newer players to have a way to ease into the field PvP?
Think about it.
The benefits from these events are twofold: they satiate the veterans hunger for PvP, and they ease in newer players to PvP.
Oh, and they're FUN.
i never mentioned afkers.Tron wrote:This really is a stupid thread. Made just to "play that card too"?
This kind of attitude is childish.
And I think the "afkers ruin it" argument is tired, hemperor. The page button is there, do your part and report them. The afkers WERE not at bad as people make it out to be. It may have had it's moments, but it was not rampant and isn't something the players can't police themselves.
Not everything here is about the pvp. You guys considered that there are many other ways of playing this game?Clyde- wrote: Hm i might stop to think that if it were true. I was gone for over two months and just came back recently, and guess what? I saw NO new pvper's whatsoever, and the one's i do find run for the hills as soon as they get close to half hp.
Satiate the veterans hunger for pvp? Are you not listening? We are veterans and guess what? We HATEEE the events b/c they are boring. Vets dont want to log on to the same repetitive CTF, DD, LMS bs every day just to satisfy our pvp hunger. What on earth do we gain by that? Yeah, maybe if we could loot the people we killed or if there was any value in it at all. I find it pathetic that i see 50 people joining these events most of whom i've never heard of in my entire time on this shard. Then when i leave the event and go out looking for real pvp action...i find maybe, MAYBE, 2 of the people who were at that entire event.
All those events do is cater to the sissy's who are terrified of losing thier cheap, craphole loot bag anyways. And it shows b/c when they do step out on the feild they run asap b/c they are terrified of dying. So instead they resort to the comfort of the events. I mean honestly how much does your loot cost, 5k tops? Unless you have a magic wep.
I've said this before, but YOU WILL NEVER GET BETTER unless you stay and fight. Running a ctf flag back and forth avoiding getting ganked doesnt teach anyone how to pvp whatsoever. I died about a million times losing tons of loot before i learned the mechanics of it. If we're going to leave this in for the enjoyment of the game, i think we could all agree to remove attack last target spam since it too would be much more enjoyable. Oh but wait......that's not accurate, nvm my bad.
This is not an accuracy issue Matron... The matter at hand is that the events "take away" people from the actual world and place them in an "instance" like environment. That is the only problem with the events in all honesty. You cannot argue the accuracy position since they are a policy issue instead of game mechanic.Faust wrote:Arguing about events when it comes to era accuracy isn't possible. The events that happened on original shards varied from shard to shard. This argument is no different than trying to argue macroing and policy decisions. The events is not a game mechanic(what is being replicated here based on accuracy) not the different policies from one shard to the next that isn't possible to replicate. This is like trying to argue the Iron Oak invassion(the unique Iron reaper in Brit GY on the Baja shard) isn't accurate since it didn't happen on another shard. The events may in fact be automated but this is simply an improvement to the policy based on very few staff. Again, still not a game mechanic change but a policy change sinc events were UNIQUE. The events here are simply unique to this shard no different than the unique quality that other shards have, nothing more.
Now trying to argue bandages cutting towards policy change isn't feesible. Bandages cutting one by one HAPPENED on ALL shards unlike the unique events that happened from one shard to the next... This is the difference between game mechanic replication that is this server's main goal and policy decision replication which isn't the goal of this shard due to the fact it's not even possible. Trying to argue both topics into one isn't possible unless one shard had existed in the OSI shard list which obviously was never the case. You cannot replicate policy no different than trying to replicate your/mine/anyone's personal or social experience that they had during the t2a era. It just isn't possible unless you figured out how to build a time machine.
I've had those since back in 2008..Homie wrote:Just a question.. were you already arguing against events before deacon got his blessed true black sandals?
ironfistmax wrote:Alatar is one of the best PvPers I have known. I have played UO since 1998 and every free shard known to man. It's not questionable whether he is good or not.
Hemperor wrote:Alatar is a douche bag but at least he and cr3w would fight everyone.
No, he is trying to argue that your motivation for removing events is bc you already have the l33t3st gear available from them (he did the same to blackfoot in the ctf-dd trophies thread)...alatar wrote:I've had those since back in 2008..Homie wrote:Just a question.. were you already arguing against events before deacon got his blessed true black sandals?
I was about to argue that they would be different if not hosted in a scripted environment, but I see that you mentioned merging them into the "real world" which makes sense. I am all for moving as many "safe" events as possible into the real world where certain player-templates may participate in the event or on the sidelines (yes I am talking about stealing/looting ect). I'm not insisting that events be removed.Faust wrote:
Tournaments would function no differently if it was held by a staff member or script making them different in my opinion. The location of the arena's could very well be merged into the real world possibly. However, if the staff chooses to remove all the events, all events except tourney's, or leave them it's their decision since it's based on a policy decision. I just think it would be more beneficial if the events were not based on an "instance" based system and should be merged into the world even if it means a change or removal of a particular event. Tournaments on the other hand would function no different and would be the easiest to "merge" for obvious reasons.