Page 2 of 2
Re: FORBES of UOSA
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2011 11:40 pm
by Roser
hax
Re: FORBES of UOSA
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 2:38 am
by Hans
Hans wrote:*Hans PWNs the thread.*
Photoshop* was not used in the making of this "screenshot"
(The Gimp was used.)
I am quoting myself here. I thought I was clear in my first post, but I guess you missed it. Read the big red words.
To those unaware, The Gimp is a photo editor, similar to photoshop.
Re: FORBES of UOSA
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 4:52 am
by son
If you used the gimp, you are a pimp or mayhaps a pimpette
Re: FORBES of UOSA
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 12:30 pm
by Roser
I smell Illuminati Conspiracy.
L337 hax
Re: FORBES of UOSA
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 12:32 am
by Braden
It would be interesting to generate an internal list on the amount of gold everyone has.
Re: FORBES of UOSA
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 1:03 am
by Safir
Braden wrote:It would be interesting to generate an internal list on the amount of gold everyone has.
Heh! Just don't share it, that would prolli lead to an immediate and massive inflation. ;)
Re: FORBES of UOSA
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 1:03 am
by Hicha
Braden wrote:It would be interesting to generate an internal list on the amount of gold everyone has.
If richest was defined by bank balance alone, then sure, but I'd like to see factors like rares or property value included as well.
Re: FORBES of UOSA
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 11:44 am
by Pirul
How would you value property? I am sure some small houses (or a group of them) might be worth more than towers or keeps placed in inhospitable places (Dagger or swamps).
Re: FORBES of UOSA
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 12:48 pm
by son
Just /thread this. We all know its Miller
Re: FORBES of UOSA
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 11:59 pm
by Mirage
Nice sig felix