UO Second Age

There is, in fact, an upkeep cost. I do not know if this cost is a "going forward" measure and past add-ons are exempt or what. Now, though, the guilds do have to pay an Upkeep Cost.

~Smithy

For those of you concerned about ghost towns full of addons, I spoke with the GMs about upkeep costs, and they confirmed that there ARE monthly fees. They aren't cheap either, so we'll have to stay active in order to keep them.

I hope that alleviates some of your worries.

YES to the Addons

Big Yes. Great guild, and been running for a long time.

I voted yes for the simple reason ive known one C^V member for as long as ive played SA.......our paths may differ but Deranger has always been a stand up guy .........as for C^V dissappearing anytime soon i have my doubts.

Cheers guys
Joe Strummer WL

Great job on the "Call to Arms" event. The RP bit could have easily been overdone, but you guys made it fun for all. Also, I've been using your shops--more cheap rares please. C^V is worthy of town add ons. Keep up the good work!

When I look at the C^V guild roster, I see players who have a mature attitude, who are helpful to new players, active on the Forum, and who make me proud to be part of this wonderful UOSA community.

I really enjoyed the recent Call to Arms event, and I eagerly look forward to seeing what C^V come up with next!

I heart C^V, aye from me!

I want to extend my gratitude to all who have voted. We are pleased that the rest of the server feels we are as deserving as we feel we are. It's been a long road to get to where we are now

Zelek Uther wrote:I really enjoyed the recent Call to Arms event, and I eagerly look forward to seeing what C^V come up with next!

I'm happy you enjoyed the event. I wrote the storyline for the event, and am working on our next one. We also have some smaller activities planned, which are my current endeavor. I was waiting on the results of this poll before I started putting pen to paper, but it's looking like I can go ahead and get going on them.

Thank you for your votes, both the aye's and the nay's. We would still like to get some comments from some of the nay's to see if there's anything in particular that we need to work on, or if (like applejack) it's simply an aversion to addon's, in general.

And, of course, we would also like to hear from more of the aye's, just because we all love being praised.

Panthor the Hated wrote:I voted aye because I like C^V, but theres been tons of add on requests lately so I hesitated a bit. In 6 months we're going to have several dead towns with add ons, which is basically just litter at that point.

voted yes but agree with panthor

Sandro wrote:

Panthor the Hated wrote:I voted aye because I like C^V, but theres been tons of add on requests lately so I hesitated a bit. In 6 months we're going to have several dead towns with add ons, which is basically just litter at that point.

voted yes but agree with panthor

It's an understandable concern. There is an upkeep fee so if we go away, so will they.

You got a definate yes from me. You guys are wonderful allies in my book

Thanks to everyone who has voted thus far, and for posting reasons either way. Please let us know what you think, good or bad, its all important!

Ee gib YUB vot. Uu'r gug gild. We uk tu sieh shinnies whan eem mougg clomp Nu Win'mir.

Hoho.