UO Second Age

just gonna ask this to the owner of this thread how many accounts do u have if u say more then one your going against your own cause

Say what you will about me bitching, the overwhelming majority of people would prefer to have one account.
I understand it will suck losing some toons you spent a lot of time on, but it will also open the server up to being more sociable. You will actually need to talk to other players. By the way, duck era accuracy, we run this game on razor. Unattended macro's were punishable in era. You should feel blessed to have one account and razor.

UsualSuspect wrote:Say what you will about me bitching, the overwhelming majority of people would prefer to have one account.
I understand it will suck losing some toons you spent a lot of time on, but it will also open the server up to being more sociable. You will actually need to talk to other players. By the way, duck era accuracy, we run this game on razor. Unattended macro's were punishable in era. You should feel blessed to have one account and razor.

still didnt answer my question how many accounts do u have?

It doesn't matter how many accounts he has, the points are valid regardless.

I feel blessed to have the 3 accounts the rules here say I can have.Just like I had 3 or 4 accounts on OSI.

You could have 50 accounts on OSI and they didnt care.

LudKrud wrote:I feel blessed to have the 3 accounts the rules here say I can have.Just like I had 3 or 4 accounts on OSI.

You could have 50 accounts on OSI and they didnt care.

Yes, OSI was perfectly happy selling people software, and collecting monthly fees.

I... hey... there we go !

UOSA, first account free. Additional accounts $10 per/mo. Max of 3.

Woot.

I think thats where copyright infringement comes in......

Most of the people who try to destroy the shard usually aim at people's accounts or things that make the shard fun...just saying.
If you enforce destroying people's hard work it will make them mad enough to leave.
One thing you have to realize bro, the people here are definately not stupid...

But thanks for posting

I have 3 accounts but could easily (and happily) consolidate my 5 best characters.

Whilst this is the best attempt at a T2A shard on the net, I don't think anybody here can seriously claim this shard is an accurate representation of T2A UO because it quite simply isn't. Mechanically maybe, but in a gameplay and community sense absolutely no way.

But on the other hand I don't see how limiting accounts or other artificial attempts to bring back that gameplay will ever make it happen. We probably have the best we're going to get.

I agree partially, number one all old school players are defending multiple accounts but who actually spent 30 to 40 a month to have them,,, very few I'm sure. I think limiting us to one account is a bit drastic. I would be fine with two and that would help the economy and social aspect quite a bit, but I feel the regulation of even having three is weak. I say actually enforcing the rules at hand would help a lot.

I think the best solution is not to limit accounts. I dont think the number of accounts really matters. I think its people using razor to play 3 accounts at the same time. I think what they should do is not limit the accounts but limit it so you can only log onto one account at a time. Or even better if its possible make it one account limit but that account can have 15 char slots and not 5.

I had one main paid account over the years and multiple dummy accounts for various things, but would rarely pay for them so they would only last a month.
I also had access to at least 6 other paid accounts.

I love using multiple accounts, its how this game should be played. If anything I would want the account limit increased, not decreased.

Sheer Luck wrote:UOSA, first account free. Additional accounts $10 DONATION per/mo. Max of 3.

Fixed. I'd be happy with this setup, and donation would keep from being sued.