Sheer Luck wrote:EVeee wrote: The first is - why is it so widely considered repulsive to scam people?
Personal thought here.. it's an age thing, a technology thing.
In the day, many older players <Mid-20's + > brought their real-world morals with them. Murdering someone, taking their possessions and slaughtering their livestock in RL resulted in inconvenient
prison terms. To these players, they came into the gates of UO and had to adjust personal beliefs to match the scenario. This is the world the "writers" and Richard Garriot intended. They built this "sandbox" coming from the same mindset. It has been well documented that they were quite shocked when....
Many Younger players viewed UO differently. They were raised with Nintendos, Sega and the internet. This wasn't an inclusive a social media for them, it was another video game.
Games had RULES: You did this you got *Loot* .... Do that, and you *Died*.
Everything they saw in UO was based on that. They went with the the profit margin. They PK'd. They stole, and they
Scammed. No Moral compass applied. Pretty simple, really.
An older *Blue* player got PWND in-game and thought
"Man, WTF. UO is full of Dirtbags."
A Younger *Red* Player gets PWND and thinks *Man that was freakin' AWESOME, how did he do that??*
EVeee wrote: My second question is - to what extent (if any) is scamming punishable by staff/admins? .
It's about the rules, Man!
Anything that happens in-game, according to the mechanics of the era, is fair game. Spell-book scams, Real Estate Douche-baggery, Trade Window then Steal, are all era-accurate. These things were part of what UO was in Era, and are all
intended to be in UOSA.
OTOH, things are different outside the client. Luring anyone into the above type of scam using IRC or forums will get you WTFADMINPWNED, post haste. These bans are generally only for the medium they occur in. IRC luring someone into a pack of PK's, could result in a ban from #Secondage: Generally, there is no Game Account ban based on this behavior.