Must be a republican. =))Malaikat wrote:It's not an interesting idea, and it will generate no interesting conversations. Anyone who thinks this is a good idea is an idiot
j/k this is the second best response.
Must be a republican. =))Malaikat wrote:It's not an interesting idea, and it will generate no interesting conversations. Anyone who thinks this is a good idea is an idiot
Malaikat wrote:What's wrong with an uneven distribution of wealth?Excretious wrote:Great Idea.... Its appaling to see how rich certain ppl got with some of the latest IDOCs.
I'm a Libertarian...Galendae wrote:Malaikat wrote:What's wrong with an uneven distribution of wealth?Excretious wrote:Great Idea.... Its appaling to see how rich certain ppl got with some of the latest IDOCs.
Obama would not like this response. You have heard of the NSA, right?
Malaikat is obviously a 1% *sniff*
Those accounts of yours Mal....you did not build those! You did it on the back of Newbs you PK'd!!!
Malaikat, heading soon to a FEMA Camp for re-education, what a troglydyte!
Budner wrote:Your sig lets everyone know what an arrogant prick you are.
Malaikat wrote:I'm a Libertarian...Galendae wrote:Malaikat wrote:What's wrong with an uneven distribution of wealth?Excretious wrote:Great Idea.... Its appaling to see how rich certain ppl got with some of the latest IDOCs.
Obama would not like this response. You have heard of the NSA, right?
Malaikat is obviously a 1% *sniff*
Those accounts of yours Mal....you did not build those! You did it on the back of Newbs you PK'd!!!
Malaikat, heading soon to a FEMA Camp for re-education, what a troglydyte!
I often joke that I'm the poorest shard vet. I don't own a tamer and I don't idoc. I'm actually a testament to the fact that you can compete and have fun without owning mills in rares or watching dragons breath fire at gazers 24/7. I don't care about trammel so the fact that a handful of people hoard all of it bothers me not at all. That's the way it's always been. You're all salty that you recently had a shot to own some yourselves and came up short.
Regardless, a shard wipe or item deletion would always be the worst idea ever. Like in any economy, it isn't fairness or equality that matter. It's the promise of stability. It's the precise reason that Marxism sounds fine on paper and has historically produced the worst results. People don't want a clean slate. They want to know that their time and hard work will result in tangible and stable wealth - generally even though that wealth may not be as great as that possessed by others. It's still mine. Its what I've earned or been blessed enough to own, and there's no danger that I'll lose it save for by my will or stupidity.
Disheartening.Galendae wrote: Mal, what does it feel like to be the lone voice of logic, in a world full of ignorance?
Budner wrote:Your sig lets everyone know what an arrogant prick you are.
The only server? Really? I know of multiple UO servers out there with way more clients on than dead-UOSA's shameful '200 client' count.Meradin420 wrote:If you want to see this server die, and that other server that shall not be named, become the only UO server with more than 200 clients on it...than sure, rock it out.
Derrek already said when I started playing here in 2010, that no chars, no items, no houses would be wipe.....ever....I expect him to die of old age before this place is allowed to fall...
You know all 2 of them?Pac wrote: I know of multiple UO servers out there with way more clients on than dead-UOSA's shameful '200 client' count.
People saying this would "kill the shard" - you don't get it, the shard is already dead.
Lambo wrote: And seriously what kinda pvper ever has a character with parry they take out into the field...... really