Call me out all you want, all my points are valid.Brett wrote:With the current house decay rate and average server population, there are way too many houses already. Obviously peope are creating multiple accounts to hold houses.
You know who you are. Dude who doesn't play any more but logs on to refresh his house. Sell it, it's a waste of space and must be annoying for you to have to log in and refresh it. Or, the dude who sorta likes pvp so he places a house at every single pvp hotspot. Destard, bucs, Brit gy, etc. Fuck off. Stop running to your house and fight like a man. At the very least, start a guild and let your guildmates have some houses. At least they might actually use it as more than a portable safe zone.
And the worst. Wannabe banksitter who can't save for long enough to buy a keep/castle so instead places as many large brick houses as he can, then brags to his friends about how many houses he has. If you can't afford to fill those houses with rares, then you don't need to own them.
I've quoted the parts I dislike, and I think they speak for themselves.
How you can attribute this thread to anything of value is beyond me. After all, the first sentence sounds like a fact pulled from the OP's ass. Interject more personal opinion IMO.
Oh, and who here thinks the staff hasn't thought of checking to make sure people don't own 134343 houses? I'm pretty sure Derrick is a smart guy.
Just because you don't like my opinion, doesn't mean it's a derailing one. If anything YOU are the one going off topic.
So in short, here's the valid argument from my end:
3 accounts = 15 houses, anymore than that, and the staff will handle it. The staff knows this, we know this, thanks for reminding us OP!
/thread