I'm sorry that you felt that my responses weren't palatable, but my initial response was intended to be a very clear indication of what our answer was, and that clarity necessitated that I point out that other staff members had weighed in on the decision specifically due to comments made by the person I was responding to in this very thread. The fact that the very next response from this person was to complain that we didn't do what they wanted, call out Boomland for intentionally laying out BS and stringing players along, and to complain about how we wasted player time earned the type of response that was given. That behavior can be respectfully tolerated to a point, but we are not machines and we can't and won't be expected to happily go along when that is the continual response that we receive.Teriyl wrote:Anarcho - no one is taking anything out on Kaivan. You and Boomland have both responded that events as they were will not be coming back, however, you didn't speak like and ass hat and so your words are respected.
There is no reason a point can't be made without being a dick.
Can you please provide some examples? This is a very wide statement.Menkaure wrote:Kaivan I don't think your a power stricken tyrant because you don't agree with me, I think your a power stricken tyrant because of how you treat all the players.