
One thing to ponder however, if we only have 400 IPs, is a tighter housing limit really necessary?
Derrick wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
necessary....? noCaswallon wrote:We're just going in circles here, but its been a fun, enjoyable and pleasant discussion BH, I respectfully disagree with your stance but there we go.....its not as much fun without TK rage insulting random people then calling them drug dealing arrogant elitist vets who dont care about the shard who are stupid, thou.
One thing to ponder however, if we only have 400 IPs, is a tighter housing limit really necessary?
Derrick wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
This thread has a variety of opinions on the subject: http://forum.uosecondage.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=8700Kdog77 wrote:Just glanced through the 16 pgs of this thread. I just joined the server & am curious as to how much room is left for housing. Is it crazy hard to find a spot? Or are there a fair amount of spaces left? I'm not too worried about ideal location, but it would be disappointing if there's no room to place or I'm forced to grossly overpay for an already placed house.
Any info is much appreciated, thanks.
there are Plenty of small House SpotsKdog77 wrote:Just glanced through the 16 pgs of this thread. I just joined the server & am curious as to how much room is left for housing. Is it crazy hard to find a spot? Or are there a fair amount of spaces left? I'm not too worried about ideal location, but it would be disappointing if there's no room to place or I'm forced to grossly overpay for an already placed house.
Any info is much appreciated, thanks.
Kdog77 wrote:Just glanced through the 16 pgs of this thread. I just joined the server & am curious as to how much room is left for housing. Is it crazy hard to find a spot? Or are there a fair amount of spaces left? I'm not too worried about ideal location, but it would be disappointing if there's no room to place or I'm forced to grossly overpay for an already placed house.
Any info is much appreciated, thanks.
Thanks, lol... hope you at least found one.SJane3384 wrote:There's lots still left. I can help you find one if you'd like (just covered the whole map x2 looking for the damn reindeer haha).
Hiram wrote: EDIT: I think that accounts after a certain period of inactivity (no login for 30 days maybe?) should go into an inactive status where their houses go into the above mentioned unrefreshable status. If the player has not logged in by the 35th day, the house will have collapsed and all contents inside would be free for lootination. This process would leave all of the accounts characters and possessions in packs or banks in place should they ever log back in to play, but their housing footprint would no longer be around to affect us all
Me too!Sufferings wrote:Hiram wrote: EDIT: I think that accounts after a certain period of inactivity (no login for 30 days maybe?) should go into an inactive status where their houses go into the above mentioned unrefreshable status. If the player has not logged in by the 35th day, the house will have collapsed and all contents inside would be free for lootination. This process would leave all of the accounts characters and possessions in packs or banks in place should they ever log back in to play, but their housing footprint would no longer be around to affect us all
I vote for that!
The problem is anyone who is a friend of the house can refresh it... lets say you place 15 houses and friend a couple people.. then you decide to not play for a long time.. all your friends can refresh your house for you while you are away. now lets just say that guy is not you and is just some random tool you dont know... this guy is taking up a bunch of space without even playing the game.. thus wasting all the players time and space.moomtazz wrote:If dead accounts are taking up space then I would vote that the houses go. But obviously someone is refreshing them.