UO Second Age

4579190a wrote:Im sure someone could go make a private server smake on cheese cake or some server name and put like 3 balrons in the balron room take a screen shot and post it on the fourms and THEN bam the gms will probly ut 3 balrons in the balron room

mm good idea go do that

4579190a wrote:seems like mens rea is scared his perfect pvp shard is ganna be nerfed

Mens Rea didn't even play T2A; and you're right, he is afraid of the status quo changing in favor of authentic era mechanics.

4579190a wrote:Im sure someone could go make a private server smake on cheese cake or some server name and put like 3 balrons in the balron room take a screen shot and post it on the fourms and THEN bam the gms will probly ut 3 balrons in the balron room

The screenshot in question was digitally dated. This comment is really insulting because the gms/developers of second age have worked really hard to acheive mechanical accuracy. They are all reasonable people who will make changes based on facts which players research and present.

Foefoucheaux wrote: The screenshot in question was digitally dated.

Hey, what's this little clock in the lower right hand of my screen do? *click* *click*

This comment is really insulting

No one is attacking the shard's management or anyone else for that matter. If you're insulted, I suggest you evaluate that personally.

Malaikat wrote:

Foefoucheaux wrote: The screenshot in question was digitally dated.

Hey, what's this little clock in the lower right hand of my screen do? *click* *click*

This is not what I meant at all by a digital date. Rather, when this screenshot was brought to the debate the date the file was created was shown and considered.

This comment is really insulting

No one is attacking the shard's management or anyone else for that matter. If you're insulted, I suggest you evaluate that personally.

It is insulting because it suggests the staff is reactionary, easily swayed without proof, and seemingly stupid. It is an insult to someone who works hard to say that they would put an obvious inaccuracy into function from a forged screenshot.

Malaikat what exactly did your comment contribute to the conversation other than to expose yourself as ignorant of basic computer functions and unable to process inference?

Foefoucheaux wrote: Malaikat what exactly did your comment contribute to the conversation other than to expose yourself as ignorant of basic computer functions and unable to process inference?

Other than the entertainment gained by having the conversation I'm about to start with you?

Probably nothing...

...if you refuse the fact that "digital time stamp" means precisely dick all when you can easily change the time in the operating system or even BIOS of the computer capturing the image.

But what do I know? Nine years as a network engineer/administrator and I'm still ignorant to basic computer functions.

I'm really old school.

OMG time travel! My ignorant mind can not fathom the ways in which you could accomplish the amazing feats of advanced computer usage necessary to crap on Einstein's theory of special relativity.

ther was no windows vista or 7 in 1981 :/

4579190a wrote:ther was no windows vista or 7 in 1981 :/

Its a timestamped screenshot, everyone knows this evidence is undisputable.

huh im confused lol and also if it was really tooken at 81... moonglow would be packed with people

4579190a wrote:huh im confused lol and also if it was really tooken at 81... moonglow would be packed with people

lol, this is the best thread ever.

it's more a troll thread since all the haters have no basis for argument left

YOURMOM wrote:

4579190a wrote:huh im confused lol and also if it was really tooken at 81... moonglow would be packed with people

lol, this is the best thread ever.

It is xD

4579190a wrote:huh im confused lol and also if it was really tooken at 81... moonglow would be packed with people

wow