Page 3 of 3
Re: Accuracy Debate Solution?
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:54 pm
by Guerrilla
I don't thinik its a bad idea at all, that would be pretty fun, but man, talk about code
Re: Accuracy Debate Solution?
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 8:00 pm
by noxmonk
Additionally, 2 years worth of patches inside what kind of a time frame? 1 year? 6 months? 9 months? I see it as lofty to try and get it right and very little testing to do.
Re: Accuracy Debate Solution?
Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 8:12 am
by Faust
The same approach used with the current system would take place Nox. If someone discovers something out of a particular time frame it simply gets fixed or put on the list to be fixed. A simple code check for the time frame gets inserted and it's done.
Not very hard to do at all.