Reason for Donations????....probably will be deleted

[Arcott Ramathorn]

I was beside his guild's keep as he logged in.

You were also making assumptions more than once that the staff favor me, which is anything but that. I was banned over forum talk, nothing ingame (cheating or anything).

Aha... so you were stalking him in game! I knew it! Im just kiddin again, seems like he was giving you an undue hard time and deserved to get his pee pee slapped like he did. Well i still favor some of what you have to say...Now go get them ghosters!

[Coffee]

I didn't really read this thread, so my opinion doesn't matter per se.

That said, Canada makes shitty whiskey (i lik ur beer) and Hemperor's an okay dude.


Also, donations mean dogshit outside of the fact that you like the shard and want to show support/relieve some of Derrick's financial burden.

[Faust]

Let me make it clearer for you.

I don't need any pat on the back from either you or Faust on "improved" behavior, neither of you are prime examples yourselves. Lately I have been doing the exact same thing I've been doing since I joined here, participating in the efforts to recreate a more accurate shard.

This is definitely not true, lol. You were one of the hardcore advocates trying to change the accuracy stand point of this shard. You even went as far to say you were quitting to go play on other shards. There were numerous complaints that you had about accurate issues insta hit, one second damage delay on spells, spell disruption, etc... I don't know where this "I care about accuracy" thing came from but it definitely did not exist prior to your banning like you just claimed.

Also, don't worry I am certainly not praising you on improved behavior, lol. I know you're the same person just trying to avoid any future ban. However, I don't think you will risk another ban after the last one was removed.

Who ever suggested that I am an example of "good behavior"?

I am everyone's worst nightmare son...

[Derrick]

This thread is a little over the top for this forum, and I'd rather not see it in trash talk, so locking.

To summarize: if you're looking for injustice, you'll find it everywhere.

Staff are human, we are very likely going to, intentionally or not, allow previous interactions with specific people to somewhat color future interactions, however we do our best within the limits of our own sanity to treat all incidents independently and fairly without bias.