UO Second Age

Malaikat wrote:I still refuse to admit that my friends are idiots and haven't learned anything in the past year. I will just keep attacking Lightshade with baseless accusations that I cannot prove.

Please do so! I enjoy the laughs!

Heh, every exchange with you follows the same progression. You puff out your chest until someone calls you out, then you waffle back and forth in a ridiculous game of semantics and un-logic followed promptly by girlish whining of personal attacks.

I have no idea what you're even talking about, and my best guess is that you don't either. What accusations? The only one making baseless accusations is you, claiming to be horrible at pvp and then withdrawing that statement to uphold the prowess of your unnamed and unknown alternate...

I troll forums pretty hard looking for debates or other entertaining conversations. I have for many years. Throughout that time I've encountered people so insane and deluded that reading their drivel actually makes me less intelligent. People who make no sense to any rational being, but somehow feel that they're sounding well organized and logical.

You, sir, are one such individual.

Malaikat wrote:I have no idea what you're even talking about, and my best guess is that you don't either. What accusations? The only one making baseless accusations is you, claiming to be horrible at pvp and then withdrawing that statement to uphold the prowess of your unnamed and unknown alternate...

Logic 101: I can be horrible at PvP, and still be better than you and your friends.

Anywho, I will continue to hardly PvP at all. You will continue to try to measure everything in this game by PvP. I will continue to laugh at all of this.

Light Shade wrote: Logic 101: I can be horrible at PvP, and still be better than you and your friends.

Anywho, I will continue to hardly PvP at all. You will continue to try to measure everything in this game by PvP. I will continue to laugh at all of this.

And I asked better at what? You refused to offer a straight answer because, if the answer is "better at pvp", then I'd like you to put up or shut up. If the answer is anything other than, "better at pvp", gtfo the thread because no one here is interested in how many gazers your dragons can kill in an hour or literally anything else you think is interesting about UO.

Malaikat wrote:And I asked better at what? You refused to offer a straight answer because, if the answer is "better at pvp", then I'd like you to put up or shut up. If the answer is anything other than, "better at pvp", gtfo the thread because no one here is interested in how many gazers your dragons can kill in an hour or literally anything else you think is interesting about UO.

First off, I haven't had a single stable slot for anything since...before I went on deployment...so we're talking years. I may have had one for a day or so, but i'm sure I gave it away. I have been offered 70+ WW's w/ stable slots for free. I declined, though, as that stables issue is something I don't like. I refuse to be part of the problem with things like that anymore.

As far as this wonderful PvP is concerned...
back when I actually did practice and engage in PvP whenever I could...
I remember these valiant PvP'ers that you keep trying to defend indirectly...by attacking me...

They were constantly downgrading towers, re-deeding houses, etc...so that they could afford to re-equip themselves in order to fight my friends and I.

You and your friends were a joke then.

The status quo has not changed...save for in your own minds.

Keep trying, though. Perhaps you'll someday be taken seriously...by anyone.

In the meantime, you and your friends just keep patting each other on the back and telling yourselves that you are good. You guys need the encouragement, afterall.

Keep running around in mental circles. I'm not tired.

Malaikat wrote:Keep running around in mental circles. I'm not tired.

Your words are.

Sure. Whatever that's supposed to mean.

Keep making noncommittal claims about being better at something or another until this thread gets locked or moved or otherwise derailed. The fact remains that you wouldn't dare commit to a 1v1 against me, and Hazy's a better pvper than I am...

Instead I'll have to settle for this illogical runaround of half truths and nonsensical circular reasoning.

iamantitype is the only poster who's earned the right to say either Hazy or I suck. You and the OP can shove off.

Malaikat wrote:and Hazy's a better pvper than I am...

This may be the funniest thing i've ever heard you say.

You want to know what's really funny?

1v1 either of us.

I'll await your hilarious dodge.

I'll set the rules down and broker for accounts!!

1v1 - Lightshade vs. Malakait
Nightsight potions only
GM Skinning knives, daggers or chargeless wands ONLY!!
Spider's Silk is the only reg allowed

Duel can be held in ACE Arena, mYm duel pit, or Trammel (as these are the only real measures of PvP skills).

Strictly forbidden to attack each other on the field with whatever you have on, and with whatever numbers fall on each side!! (pffft, that ain't PvP!!)

EDIT: Forgot 2 very important rules!!

1.- No Magic Reflect
2.- No holding Greater Heals
. (^ Only [synonim for small cat, word commonly used by cartel members] do that...also, that ain't PvP!!!)

And...enter hilarious dodge. The satire is a little thick for me. I prefer dry subtle humor.

Uhm...was not meant to be hilarious or funny ...

... to you at least, as you clearly think "grudging" is the only measure of someone being "better", as there is nothing else in this game that can prove that one is "better" than another. So by this logic, if you beat Sandro or Fede in a 1v1 tourny, you win at UO!!

Pirul wrote:Uhm...was not meant to be hilarious or funny ...

... to you at least

I enjoy irony as much as the next guy...

as you clearly think "grudging" is the only measure of someone being "better", as there is nothing else in this game that can prove that one is "better" than another. So by this logic, if you beat Sandro or Fede in a 1v1 tourny, you win at UO!!

I'd say consistency would be required...but that's really not my point in any of this.

I've asked LS to tell me what he's better at and he refuses because the entire discussion has been framed within the context of pvp. No one here cares about him being better at anything else because that's not what we're discussing. Since he's not willing to prove his pvp worth, and also unwilling to admit he's worse than Hazy, we're left with this humorous game of ridiculous mock diplomacy.

Additionally, I respect you for coming to the aid of your guild mate, but it's honestly sad that LS would have you post here...the man can't even forum pvp 1v1.

OMG, I wonder if you really are or only play.... I commend you for that!

Malaikat wrote:

Pirul wrote:as you clearly think "grudging" is the only measure of someone being "better", as there is nothing else in this game that can prove that one is "better" than another. So by this logic, if you beat Sandro or Fede in a 1v1 tourny, you win at UO!!

I'd say consistency would be required...

This tells me all I need to know.

Malaikat wrote:Additionally, I respect you for coming to the aid of your guild mate, but it's honestly sad that LS would have you post here...the man can't even forum pvp 1v1.

LS did not "have me" post here, and I really regret having done so, as it was clearly a waste of my time.