A forum for discussion of Second Age UO Shard
http://forums.uosecondage.com/
What are you disputing? Some patch note? You're not very clear.Mephistopheles wrote:As time passes and the new patches continue to pop up I'm wondering how will any of us know that the entries on the Wikipedia aren't simply edited to fit somebody's agenda?
For example, I think that damage should be cut in half and then absorbed by armor.
How about I tweak that entry and then talk about this a few months down the road when nobody has taken notice because I really like playing on my hally mage!
After all, it's open ended for anyone to manipulate.
Since people such as Faust love their empirical evidence, perhaps you should provide a genuine link and not some player made website that was created by people who use this shard?
Food for thought.
Good luck.
No, I was very clear. Don't try to shift focus from what I was talking about by pretending I wasn't acknowledging it in the first place.Kraarug wrote:
What are you disputing? Some patch note? You're not very clear.
About the demo? I know nothing about it.Mephistopheles wrote:No, I was very clear. Don't try to shift focus from what I was talking about by pretending I wasn't acknowledging that in the first place.Kraarug wrote:
What are you disputing? Some patch note? You're not very clear.
I won't repeat what I said before because this only leads to a dampening of the clarity behind the words I put together to form those sentences so as to weaken the original argument.
Let's try this out, I'm going to pull straws at random and add:
"The demo uses a value of 0 damage for debuff spells"
"Spell interruption formula depends on the magery skill of the caster, the spell circle being casted, and the damage taken when struck in combat."
If you are using the demo scripts
And the demo scripts say debuffs do 0 damage and we're talking about 1st-2nd circle spells (which, logically speaking, are very easy to miss an interrupt)
And nobody is doing/receiving damage from a debuff spell
I ask you to prove to me how it is that a non-damaging spell will cause an interrupt.
Provide me with this formula. Not in it's coded format but in one that makes sense. I'm sure you can do it as you seem to enjoy spending so much time on this.
hes refering to the quote in fausts original post, which is from the uosecondage wiki as apposed to an actual archived link to an official site. i was actually wondering the same thing.Kraarug wrote:What are you disputing? Some patch note? You're not very clear.Mephistopheles wrote:As time passes and the new patches continue to pop up I'm wondering how will any of us know that the entries on the Wikipedia aren't simply edited to fit somebody's agenda?
For example, I think that damage should be cut in half and then absorbed by armor.
How about I tweak that entry and then talk about this a few months down the road when nobody has taken notice because I really like playing on my hally mage!
After all, it's open ended for anyone to manipulate.
Since people such as Faust love their empirical evidence, perhaps you should provide a genuine link and not some player made website that was created by people who use this shard?
Food for thought.
Good luck.
bump.marmalade wrote:i am completely confused. how is the % chance to be interrupted by a spell calculated exactly?
sorry for being retarded but alot of what you guys are saying is going straight over the top of my head.
I thought before these changes that casting debuffs was the most popular way of interrupting, so I'm not sure what you mean by "now too".Mephistopheles wrote:And they can interrupt just by casting weaken now too.
Yes but now it does it more!Kael wrote:I thought before these changes that casting debuffs was the most popular way of interrupting, so I'm not sure what you mean by "now too".Mephistopheles wrote:And they can interrupt just by casting weaken now too.
Okay, you want me to point out a citation that I've very clearly made an example of?Kraarug wrote: About finding era accurate sources? That's something I've learned to do.
I guess what I'm saying is, if you are doubting the wiki, point out the citation and I will find the patch note or other sources. That's all.
No debuffs have a chance to not interrupt before they were 100 percentMephistopheles wrote:Yes but now it does it more!Kael wrote:I thought before these changes that casting debuffs was the most popular way of interrupting, so I'm not sure what you mean by "now too".Mephistopheles wrote:And they can interrupt just by casting weaken now too.
Okay, you want me to point out a citation that I've very clearly made an example of?Kraarug wrote: About finding era accurate sources? That's something I've learned to do.
I guess what I'm saying is, if you are doubting the wiki, point out the citation and I will find the patch note or other sources. That's all.
How about the OP?
Anyone who knows how to use Dreamweaver can fancy up a WebArchive page. All of this can be complete bull pulled over our heads because some obscure coders that play here really enjoy their scripted hally-bolt PvP.
Have fun doing more "research" as the months pass for more "era accurate" changes. Whatever pleases.
- Debuffs should not be interrupting spells a hundred percent of the time, but instead use a damage value of 0 in the spell interruption formula.archaicsubrosa77 wrote:
No debuffs have a chance to not interrupt before they were 100 percent