Page 5 of 5
Re: Pvp suggestion
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 9:11 am
by BlackFoot
Gunslinger wrote: it's the same crap with every mmorpg pvp game
This is only a pvp (combat pvp) game to a small percentage of players.
Re: Pvp suggestion
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 9:57 am
by LifeForce
Gunslinger wrote:The reason they will not get rid of these "trammelized events" is because of the fear of losing players. Too many players ride on tourney ego's and trophy point marketing.
nailed it.
imo.
Re: Pvp suggestion
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:12 pm
by Geryon
Automated pvp events with no risk of loss are totally not T2A accurate. It completely reeks of Tram.
Any arguments made against this point are like showing up to the party in ass-less chaps.
Re: Pvp suggestion
Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 11:29 am
by kill drizitz
these events last for maybe 2 hours a day MAX, the ppl in them are the same ppl that pvp on the field. you guys who are complaining probably dont pvp on the field anyways. fear of losing players is very valid, who wants to play a shard with 20 ppl online? 90% of the ppl i see in the event arena are on the field daily.
this topic is getting old, this is probably the 10th post about this same nonsense. i dont even enter the tournies, but i dont want them to be taken away. 2010 ultima online is very duel oriented for some players, and to say this pvp isnt like t2a is only because we now have the time to break down code, and see what works best 1v1 (hally timer, ebolts, harm) another invalid argument imo.