UO Second Age

archaicsubrosa77 wrote:I confused multi-clienting with multiple accounts.
I thought everyone was out to destroy the work everyone put into creating their characters.
Kind of made me upset.
I am sorry....I am sorry

Is that okay?

BURN HIM!!!!!!!!

P.S. isnt it funny we are arguing this as the shard hits an all-time high?

Biohazard wrote:
P.S. isnt it funny we are arguing this as the shard hits an all-time high?

Damn I just noticed that. Way to go UOSA
752 with me logging in now

archaicsubrosa77 wrote:I confused multi-clienting with multiple accounts.
I thought everyone was out to destroy the work everyone put into creating their characters.

I am sorry....I am sorry

Is that okay?

I'm still quite up on the idea of destroying everyone's hard work. Like I said, wipe everything. Implement a 1 client per ip, unless specifically allowed otherwise, and put a stop to all the macroing. UOSA would be a lot more interesting. Imagine, people gming their skills by hunting in the wild? GM craftables a rarity, with smiths plying their wares on the streets and doing repairs. PKs that were truly notorious as they had multiple gm skills and truly put fear into folks. A healthy player economy, housing space for all, actual meaning and achievement in gming skills... but meh, it's all a fantasy really , it ain't gonna happen. We're all too attached to our pixels to let anything change. It's a shame really, in my opinion it's the only thing that stops this shard from really being t2a I remembered.

If this does happen I am going to have to restructure some of my templates I made to enhance others though if not get rid of them all together.

I won't vote against it but it would be nice to know if it is being considered.

And if a shard wipe is being considered I'd like to bring a halt to any character creation on going now.

I think a shard wipe would be fun. Imagine all your big names running around as co-dependent newbs.

It would be like a prequel.

i would venture to say a shard wipe would never happen... unless it was the most extreme circumstances ever. you think limiting to one connection per ip would make people quit? i think a shard wipe would trump them all. i would gladly start over though as i am not attached.

this thread is full of failing dreams..

You guys really think Derrick would wipe the server as UOSA's population reachs Hybrid territory?

There is a reason why he hasn't responded to this thread..

Get real =\

Sandro wrote:this thread is full of failing dreams..

You guys really think Derrick would wipe the server as UOSA's population reachs Hybrid territory?

There is a reason why he hasn't responded to this thread..

Get real =\

Rhaps wrote: but meh, it's all a fantasy really , it ain't gonna happen. We're all too attached to our pixels to let anything change.

Actually I think I'm keeping it quite real buddy.

I think he hasnt responded because the discussion was pretty heated, also he probably wants to see how it turns out.
A shard wipe would need vetern approval to be sure. Believe it or not I would love that. Seeing a virgin UO world.
Those not active in forums might not be too keen on it however.
And the one account thing being logged in at a time I am still in favour of now I know to what it pertains and to what degree.

Biohazard wrote:ok people... for the last time... this thread is not about losing accounts and it never was... you can still have your 3 accounts and use all 3 of your accounts... its about the connections to the shard per ip simultaneously

Its also not about shard wipes...Noone does/would support a wipe so please censor it from the conversation.
1 account logged in at a time..."Stay on Target."

Arcott Ramathorn wrote:Its also not about shard wipes...Noone does/would support a wipe so please censor it from the conversation.

Well, I support it, archaic supports it and Biohazard seems up for it too. Thats 3 more than no-one. Speak for yourself and stop trying to back seat moderate.

Arcott Ramathorn wrote:Its also not about shard wipes...Noone does/would support a wipe so please censor it from the conversation.

I never said that it was.. i simply said i was not opposed...

Let's focus at one thing at a time. Which is the initial topic of multi clienting
That's how things like this never get attention..Once the initial topic is supported by enough people, than other stuff gets thrown in and the whole thing goes OT

Biohazard wrote:

Arcott Ramathorn wrote:Its also not about shard wipes...Noone does/would support a wipe so please censor it from the conversation.

I never said that it was.. i simply said i was not opposed...

I only quoted you for "truth"...thats what QFT means right? Oh, didnt add that, but thats why i quoted you specifically. I wasnt calling you out for anything, I personally believe that this thread hit on something that people could rally behind, specifically One account logged in at a time. Conversations about shard wipes will divide consensus, divert attention, and close open minds.

Rhaps wrote:

Arcott Ramathorn wrote:Its also not about shard wipes...Noone does/would support a wipe so please censor it from the conversation.

Well, I support it, archaic supports it and Biohazard seems up for it too. Thats 3 more than no-one. Speak for yourself and stop trying to back seat moderate.

Ifrit wrote:Let's focus at one thing at a time. Which is the initial topic of multi clienting
That's how things like this never get attention..Once the initial topic is supported by enough people, than other stuff gets thrown in and the whole thing goes OT

QFT.