redeeding vendors
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 9:22 pm
since this command was added "Redeedable vendors, use "<vendor> replace"
why does the "<vendor> dismiss" command still exist?
seems to me that the dismiss command should now do the same as the replace command ... or be deleted all together!!!
why does the "<vendor> dismiss" command still exist?
seems to me that the dismiss command should now do the same as the replace command ... or be deleted all together!!!