UO Second Age

They were offering an ostard for sale. I followed my guildmate blink to their gate to their house. They had a dragon there killed us both. booted us from the house as ghosts. Kept all our stuff.

Really those guys from $c$ are disreputable. Dont do business with them!!

Hazy and Co.?

You don't say?!?!

I can't give you back your poor lost souls, but perhaps this will cheer you up a bit! This is some of Hazy and Co.'s Highlights.

The Highlight Reel:

• PvP Lessons by Pringles
• Why "if"'s are important in macros
• More woes for D^D
• The Dhali Llama
• PvP Training Sponsored by D^D
• Kim Jung-il Embraces His Red Comrades
• Home Inspection Violation of D^D Guild Hall
• Bravery At Its Finest
• Epic Capet Bomb

I won't add in the dozens of other posts along the same lines...

I find that sort of behavior to be appalling. Gating people to houses for nefarious purposes is just plain WRONG.

Why is it wrong?

It even gives you a warning before you step through.

Jesus Christ. Go and eat some Trammie.

I'm glad I first played UO as my first MMO. It taught me the skills I needed to survive.

Vhyx wrote:I find that sort of behavior to be appalling. Gating people to houses for nefarious purposes is just plain WRONG.

For a minute there I thought you said appealing. hah.

Grimnir wrote:Why is it wrong?

It even gives you a warning before you step through.

Jesus Christ. Go and eat some Trammie.

I'm glad I first played UO as my first MMO. It taught me the skills I needed to survive.

There was a heavy dose of sarcasm contained within my post, Francis.

.

It is wrong...that's why it's a criminal action, unless you exploit loopholes in the game mechanics so as not to be flagged for your actions.
The beauty of UOSA is having the choice to do right or wrong.

BlaiseDad wrote:It is wrong...that's why it's a criminal action, unless you exploit loopholes in the game mechanics so as not to be flagged for your actions.
The beauty of UOSA is having the choice to do right or wrong.

What about the 3rd choice of exploiting game mechanics for immoral self-advancement, its an option IRL just as much as UO

Also opposed.
While the freedom is there, and the risk is on you, I don't condone or practice doing wrong. (in it's simplest definition: that which has a negative impact)

Yeah that $C$ gang is a real rough crowd. Lightshade I've noticed your sources you cited were outdated. Please update thanks.

Tough?
If tough means getting your castle and tower looted multiple times, wandering into town gates on stat reds on a regular basis, dying on stat reds and oranges while outnumbering your opponents on the regular (on your own tower steps most times), and ONLY playing oranges if you outnumber the competition...
then yes, you guys are a tough crowd.

Kaizer wrote:Yeah that $C$ gang is a real rough crowd. Lightshade I've noticed your sources you cited were outdated. Please update thanks.

Just copied and pasted it from another thread. I'm too lazy to find the newer ones of the same old things. I do wish I had a screenshot of Hazy pleading with me to not kill him or loot his house anymore, though. That was about as funny as it gets.

Light Shade wrote:

Kaizer wrote:Yeah that $C$ gang is a real rough crowd. Lightshade I've noticed your sources you cited were outdated. Please update thanks.

Just copied and pasted it from another thread. I'm too lazy to find the newer ones of the same old things. I do wish I had a screenshot of Hazy pleading with me to not kill him or loot his house anymore, though. That was about as funny as it gets.

In all fairness he did say he had a "friend" at his place.

Don't ask, don't tell, I guess