UO Second Age

it seems most people like it except trammel, people claim it's better than t2a in any ways except the trammel change. i have never played either t2a or uor. can you please share what you remember, i always wonder how craft menus looked like after t2a, before transparent ones. i really want to do a research about uor, is there anything like uo.stratics i can also look at with web.archive ?

.

should we laugh at this hater fanboy ? i hate all kinds of fanboiz

Wiki here --> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worlds_of_ ... ine#Worlds

not much on UO:R all i can remember is when care bare land opened I managed to place a small in fell

I had to google fanboy. You asked what people remembered, it was poop.

UO:R was terrible, unless you played Siege.

Trammel itself was terrible, and just as bad are all the things that having Trammel caused either directly or indirectly - broken economy foremost amongst them. Tamers farming all day, no risk from PKs (or anything). Genius. Worst UO period until SAMURAI ELFMAN ONLINE era.

Probably haven't really answered your questions, but I'll take any chance I can to complain about UO:R!

tentacles of the harrower in khaldun was fun always reds there

Clx wrote:UO:R was terrible, unless you played Siege.

Trammel itself was terrible, and just as bad are all the things that having Trammel caused either directly or indirectly - broken economy foremost amongst them. Tamers farming all day, no risk from PKs (or anything). Genius. Worst UO period until SAMURAI ELFMAN ONLINE era.

Probably haven't really answered your questions, but I'll take any chance I can to complain about UO:R!

The economy was broken long before UOR....

xantier wrote:it seems most people like it except trammel, people claim it's better than t2a in any ways except the trammel change. i have never played either t2a or uor. can you please share what you remember, i always wonder how craft menus looked like after t2a, before transparent ones. i really want to do a research about uor, is there anything like uo.stratics i can also look at with web.archive ?

I think there were a lot of good additions post T2a. Healing changes, class changes (Arms lore, wrestle, etc), pet changes, housing changes, new mounts, etc. etc.

IMHO, trammel and skill-scrolls where the 2 most negative updates. A tough thing with this shard (and others like it) is there is no room for growth or change.

I personally wouldnt mind keeping a t2a ruleset with some of the post t2a addtions... Unfortunately, that could never be (and shouldnt be) considered here.

actually implementing combat changes of uor on t2a would be the best because there are only a few templates do a remarkable job in this shard and it annoys me. wrestling is useless, 2 handeds are used for only prehit, 2348972 sec healing. i think uor combat is the best.

They put these little rocks in game, and then there was no one to kill anymore.

The end....

THe only thing I cared about UO was that it was everchanging and you didn't know what would come next. It was great until trammel came...on siege it was great until AOS ruined it. There was no trammel on siege. The one thing that this shard truly lacks is an ever changing world.

i remember everyone running into brit moongate and server line hopping and thinking "god i hate newb pvpers"

UO:R Was the beginning of the end of Ultima Online. By end, I mean the end of UO being a good game to play.

Although I am not sure of the exact time when Origin sold their game to EA, I'm sure it was right around the time of UO:R. UO:R is essentially an EA version of Ultima Online.

I believe that EA absolutely ruined UO and transformed it into a completely different game.

Also, FYI Telemons UO:R Shard is a piece of crap.

JUST SAYIN'

Garriot sold Origin to EA in 1992.

I believe shard advertising/bashing is against the forum ToS.. just saying.