Page 1 of 2

felucca trees

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 4:26 pm
by alatar
Convert the trees into the 'accurate' ruleset. lol

Re: felucca trees

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:45 pm
by Derrick
I'm not sure what you mean

Re: felucca trees

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:49 pm
by dirk smallwood
I think what he means is take the leaves off the trees, but since theres only 1 facet its correct the way it is

Re: felucca trees

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:53 pm
by Derrick
I see. Yea, this is neither Felucca or Trammel, this is Britainnia.

Re: felucca trees

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:03 pm
by alatar
Ok.. heh.. I know.. but everything was Felucca before Trammel came along, just thought it'd be more accurate that way but whatever.

Re: felucca trees

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:05 pm
by Khronus
i think in t2a trees were as it is then when trammel came they did that to make felucca scary and to make people know they are in felucca lol...

Re: felucca trees

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:08 pm
by Dupre[THG]
siege periolous always had naked trees

Re: felucca trees

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:08 pm
by alatar
Yes I understand that I just thought it would be more authentic this way, as most people see leaves as trammel, as that is what it was branded after the change..
Like I said not really a major issue just throwing it out there..

Re: felucca trees

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:11 pm
by Khronus
trees should stay with leaves for global warming matters... lol

Re: felucca trees

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:47 pm
by Nevermore
How would having trees as they were post-t2a be more authentic?

Re: felucca trees

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:52 pm
by alatar
Nevermore wrote:How would having trees as they were post-t2a be more authentic?
Because the majority of UO players play for the PvP. Not saying this is a PvP-only server, but that's where you'll pull most of your players. I don't know why you always knock my shit like im trying to devalue the server.. It was merely a suggestion, and you always come back with an asshole remark.

Re: felucca trees

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:53 pm
by Dupre[THG]
it would just add to the smell of death that surrounds fel. honestly naked trees is nice.
and it feels more evil, and in fel times evil is number one, hence the reason lord british had nystul create trammel and the reason he left TB to fight for Fel
http://uo.stratics.com/pics/uot2aentext.jpg
thats were you can see that in t2a trees had leaves
but i do recall siege periolous not having any

Re: felucca trees

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:23 pm
by Derrick
I think I said this above, but there is no fel, there is no trammel. It's not easy being the only guy uncorrupted by later expansions. Britannia is a beautiful land full of green leaves and happy singing birds.

Re: felucca trees

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:41 pm
by alatar
That's understandable I just thought it was another fel-only server, so I assumed it would only be right to have dead trees.

Re: felucca trees

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:45 pm
by Derrick
Yea, we're trying really hard not to be just another Pre-UO:R PvP server. To the best of my knoweledge there is no other server out there that comes anywhere near us in regards to that, and we're still not 100%, but getting closer all the time.