Sebben, got unbanned so he could give all his stuff away.
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2013 3:54 pm
I just saw in the other thread here, that the guy admitted in trash talk to asking someone to break the rules, was unbanned so he could give his friends items after being turned in.
Why would a player be allowed to do this?
Well nevermind, maybe they are.
But why would the guy everyone says turned this guy get banned, but not be allowed to give his items to friends?
Seems like a double standard.
Also, why would any player be banned from the forums for saying they quit vs was banned? Obviously the shard needs to the drama that comes from open discussion of a banned player, why else go to such great lengths to dispel the idea that player quit?
Really banned over saying he quit vs him being banned?
Staff doesnt comment on banned players, unless they said they quit and didnt admit they got banned?
That coupled with the double-standard of allowing the guy who propositioned another player to break the rules, getting to give his items away after failing to go through with whatever it was he was doing, while the player who was propositioned being banned and not getting a chance to transfer his items to others just seems very unfair and very much a double-standard.
How can you try to give away a friends items and then claim when caught "these arent mine they are my poor friends!" and be able to be unbanned to transfer?
Anyway this seems like a bit unfair.
Why would a player be allowed to do this?
Well nevermind, maybe they are.
But why would the guy everyone says turned this guy get banned, but not be allowed to give his items to friends?
Seems like a double standard.
Also, why would any player be banned from the forums for saying they quit vs was banned? Obviously the shard needs to the drama that comes from open discussion of a banned player, why else go to such great lengths to dispel the idea that player quit?
Really banned over saying he quit vs him being banned?
Staff doesnt comment on banned players, unless they said they quit and didnt admit they got banned?
That coupled with the double-standard of allowing the guy who propositioned another player to break the rules, getting to give his items away after failing to go through with whatever it was he was doing, while the player who was propositioned being banned and not getting a chance to transfer his items to others just seems very unfair and very much a double-standard.
How can you try to give away a friends items and then claim when caught "these arent mine they are my poor friends!" and be able to be unbanned to transfer?
Anyway this seems like a bit unfair.
