Page 1 of 1

List of accuracies taken from old origin site.

Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 10:12 pm
by Flossin
I recently looked up the official UO site dated April 22nd 1999 using archive.org (you can access this using this link http://web.archive.org/web/199904220500 ... ww.owo.com) And found a whole bunch of differences and notes that aren't applied to this shard that I'd like to share with you guys...

Re: List of accuracies taken from old origin site.

Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 10:17 pm
by Hemperor
In your third picture, the invul tag is only displayed under his name because it would be too long to fit onto the same line.

Try typing "Lord British (invulnerable)" in game :P

Re: List of accuracies taken from old origin site.

Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 10:18 pm
by Flossin
I'm sure there's WAY more info on the old website that I have missed so I encourage everyone to give it a look and see what they can find.

Re: List of accuracies taken from old origin site.

Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 10:20 pm
by Hemperor
You are basically listed images of patch notes, they are all in there :)

The radiating damage picture is certainly a nice find though.

Re: List of accuracies taken from old origin site.

Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 10:48 pm
by Caswallon
Are we sure thats not a mock up? Or from an incomplete internal T2A beta? UO had some outrageously false/early photos of the game on its site and retail boxes, im sure we have all seen the dragon guarding the treasure on the bridge that does not exist in game.

I dont recall rotting corpses or ice fiends spawning in the city of the dead, and where is the rest of the spawn? such odditys are a trademark of press grabs and beta screens.

Re: List of accuracies taken from old origin site.

Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 10:50 pm
by Jack
add the ymca

Re: List of accuracies taken from old origin site.

Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 11:48 pm
by Silverfoot
Those house lockdowns/secures are from the second housing system during t2a from late 1999. The shard currently uses the housing system from when t2a first came out in late '98 and the lockdowns/secures we have here are accurate to that.

Re: List of accuracies taken from old origin site.

Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 4:08 pm
by MatronDeWinter
Caswallon wrote: I dont recall rotting corpses or ice fiends spawning in the city of the dead, and where is the rest of the spawn? such odditys are a trademark of press grabs and beta screens.
This, there was never such a spawn at the CoTd.

Re: List of accuracies taken from old origin site.

Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:07 pm
by Cutpurse
The ice fiend pic was a mock up done for promotional purposes. It wasn't actually in-game.

Re: List of accuracies taken from old origin site.

Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:48 pm
by archaicsubrosa77
MatronDeWinter wrote:
Caswallon wrote: I dont recall rotting corpses or ice fiends spawning in the city of the dead, and where is the rest of the spawn? such odditys are a trademark of press grabs and beta screens.
This, there was never such a spawn at the CoTd.
There are ways to get monsters in...gating at least then or otherwise even now as long as you can retrieve a spawn outside dungeon areas i.e. T-Hunting.

Re: List of accuracies taken from old origin site.

Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:18 pm
by Caswallon
No one would dispute that Archaic but that does not alter the fact that the shot in question is a mock up, its not from a live shard.

Re: List of accuracies taken from old origin site.

Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:28 pm
by archaicsubrosa77
agreed unless theres some weird way to evolve daemons.

Re: List of accuracies taken from old origin site.

Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:52 pm
by Derrick
Cutpurse wrote:The ice fiend pic was a mock up done for promotional purposes. It wasn't actually in-game.
I agree with this as well, additionally the range from the daemon is more than two tiles, there should not have been ice damage at that range. My only reference on which is the clients player in that pic though is from the cursors direction.

I haven't yet added radiation damage to Ice Fiends, lacking evidence of it; but I would take this as evidence that they did radiate damage if there as no other rational objection.