It wasnt called felucca, it was Britaniaalatar wrote:Ok.. heh.. I know.. but everything was Felucca before Trammel came along, just thought it'd be more accurate that way but whatever.
felucca trees
Forum rules
Posts in this forum are expected to be constructive, realistic and civil. Inflamatory or off topic posts will be removed.
Posts in this forum are expected to be constructive, realistic and civil. Inflamatory or off topic posts will be removed.
Re: felucca trees
The First Player Of UO Second Age.
Re: felucca trees
i meant felucca ruleset
Re: felucca trees
alatar wrote:Because the majority of UO players play for the PvP. Not saying this is a PvP-only server, but that's where you'll pull most of your players. I don't know why you always knock my shit like im trying to devalue the server.. It was merely a suggestion, and you always come back with an asshole remark.Nevermore wrote:How would having trees as they were post-t2a be more authentic?
How was than an asshole remark? It was a simple question. We try to be an accurate t2a era server. How would putting in something that's not t2a accurate be more authentic?
I'm a chemistry set that makes only firecrackers and smoke bombs.
-
dirk smallwood
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 12:59 am
Re: felucca trees
alatar wrote:i meant felucca ruleset
It is felucca ruleset. The only difference is a number (1-4) In the weather.cs. It has nothign to do with the ruleset, and is exactly how it should be.
Re: felucca trees
Leave my pretty trees alone!
Guerrilla wrote:
i know i cry alot.... its only because i suck, and I'm going to uninstall UO as you read this
Re: felucca trees
Who gives a shit?. The trees were "nomal" looking in T2A on all the shards except siege. Close thread and/or delete. kthanksbye.