Alright. Don't let EVs see the museum.BlackFoot wrote:Yes, the museum will probably need some expert advice on EV proofing
How much you gonna pay me?
Alright. Don't let EVs see the museum.BlackFoot wrote:Yes, the museum will probably need some expert advice on EV proofing
Just hit me up on a weekend sometime.BlackFoot wrote:Yes, the museum will probably need some expert advice on EV proofing
Sebben will be hitting you up!Light Shade wrote:Just hit me up on a weekend sometime.BlackFoot wrote:Yes, the museum will probably need some expert advice on EV proofing
Seem permanent to me.Maahes wrote:Any game master additions to the museum are not permanent, Blackfoot is using a lot of his own time to prepare events for the players, we just think it's appropriate to help him out a little bit with things he can't do.
Denis the Menace wrote:Vega for me you are just exploiting the uosa system with your vanq charged spellreflect recall invis pink boobi pvp trammel style which never existed on osi, so stfu.
Jakob wrote:Regardless of douchebag, fair player or Vega.
Almost every statue in the museum is before your time as far as I remember. Myself, Coffee, and Demon Arkanis were some of the first people on the shard in the grand scheme of things. Demon Arkanis was a bit of a nemesis to me. As for other names on the list, their contributions at the time were recognized when the statues were created. Why we didn't continue the statue concept? I'm not entirely sure as I was not staff at the time nor involved in the process much. I can't imagine this "statue program" for lack of a better name will be picked back up, but if it were, I'd love to take the current names along with new names, and place them in a non-player owned structure. I wasn't 100% on board with them being added to the UoH tower at the time.Taboo wrote:For a while, i compared my place to this one but then I stopped. My place is actually relevant.
I am still here. My place is used by close friends and family looking for some carefree UO to which I finance.
... and yes its also jacked full of rares.
On the other hand, Biscophan has the demeanor of someone who believes he is blessing us with his presence by banksitting. Once while I was trying to help a new player on brit bank roof, he made a snotty remark about me using a "5 year bracelet" (even though my IG Taboo account is really something like 7). I mean, really?
I don't believe Biscophan or most of the player's statues inside their museum are actually older or at least very much older players than myself.
I'm pretty sure I still have some kill screen shots of Hemporer somewhere from my time in ACE and I am in some of chumbucket's "comic strips".
It all seems very very overrated and self serving of UoH. They are a guild that no longer has a presence.
These people with statues are only a year or under a year older than me. In fact I'm not sure that all are older than myself, such as chumbucket. Not to mention, GK and biscopan are both younger but this wasn't really my point.Boomland Jenkins wrote:
Almost every statue in the museum is before your time as far as I remember. Myself, Coffee, and Demon Arkanis were some of the first people on the shard in the grand scheme of things. Demon Arkanis was a bit of a nemesis to me. As for other names on the list, their contributions at the time were recognized when the statues were created. Why we didn't continue the statue concept? I'm not entirely sure as I was not staff at the time nor involved in the process much. I can't imagine this "statue program" for lack of a better
Guardian Knight is in charge of the current UoH tower, not Blackfoot. Also, Bisco is not Blackfoot.
As for what may happen to the fountain and stones outside the UoH Tower, they will be left there until we determine how to handle future "add ons" which is currently in development. We've finally made some stances collectively as Staff and just need to get a "policy" written up on how to implement it. Any future add-ons will not be community decided but in fact GM blessings similar to the way OSI handled it.
These became silver rewards at the start of 2015. Just because something becomes a silver reward, it doesn't mean we're going to remove every instance of the item from before the change. As for addressing the statues and any "add ons" that the UoH museum has, it will be addressed when we release the newest policy and decide how to handle all remaining past "add ons".Taboo wrote: I take issue with these gm placed statues and things like, for example, vines strewn all over their tower wall face. These are silver reward items after all.
I actually agree with you and that's why I suggested my take on how to handle the old and any future statues that may or may not be created.Taboo wrote:IMO, you could also say this collection of statues is missing many players who are old. They have come and left. They had an impact. They have no statues.
Only one statue in that museum is a UoH member as far as I can tell. It's not like we've said we're rejecting new statues because the newer (who are now Vet) players are "not important" it's because Statues were only added for an extremely brief span of time.Taboo wrote:Just very very overrated and self serving of the remaining members.
There are a lot of players who contributed a lot to this server and they dont have statues.Soma wrote:Statues weren't given based off age, they were given based off player contributions to the shard.
Let them stand, it's nice to have a little bit of history on the shard in wake of the recent nukings. Besides players bitching about this are likely to be butthurt just because they didn't get "free" pixels.
There are probably 7 people who even know or mildly care about this, out with the old in with the new I say, there no sense in stagnation.It's been here for a very very long time. It has outlasted EVERYTHING and nearly EVERYONE.