Each quote was actually a different person.MatronDeWinter wrote:No I'm telling you that the one (or two) people you quoted were not OSI staff and had just as much average knowledge as we can assume anyone else had. Almost all of the posters felt that fencing was faster.Hemperor wrote:No need to be rude Matron, you only further embarass yourself. My quotes directly state "katana is faster than kryss" while yours state "yay fencing is fun".What it seems to me is that at one point kryss was faster and then the weapon tables were changed. What date is ours from?
So do you mean to tell me that real players in era had no idea what they were talking about (the vast majority around the time period of our weapon tables agree that katana is faster), but you, a no name douche thief 10 years later has a valid opinion to be considered?
Please, spare me
Your quote can directly state "katana is faster than kryss" all day long, but it's meaningless until it's quoted from a remotely-reliable source.
I was actually doing this to show that youre whole "well we remember kryss being faster" is no more valid than those quotes. You can notice this by my original line:
In fact, if anything, they would be more valid because they are 10 years older.You could say these are only statements from players during the era, but then again, you guys are only making statements 10 years after :
Weapons table changed, as one of them described it:
So everyone is right in a sense, the weapons table here is accurate to a date... What date is that, is all I want to know.OSI (sarcasm):"Let's see, all the folks who want the fastest weapon, regardless of damage,
are using fencing... all the people who want to do more damage, and are
willing to sacrifice some speed.. are taking swordsmanship.. bah, we like
swords better, screw those fencing guys... swords will now have the fastest
AND the biggest weapons.."