lotus39 wrote:DrFaustus wrote:Let me know what your word of the day is tomorrow...
Oh snap, I can tell you now its going to be reprehensible.

lotus39 wrote:DrFaustus wrote:Let me know what your word of the day is tomorrow...
Oh snap, I can tell you now its going to be reprehensible.
Wise wrote:lotus39 wrote:DrFaustus wrote:Let me know what your word of the day is tomorrow...
Oh snap, I can tell you now its going to be reprehensible.
Derrick wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The internet opens up a new behavioral environment. With purely symbolic inter-personal communications people are insulated from emotional norms and their behavior may qualify on a purely technical, diagnostic level, as socipathic, but those behavioral norms were not established through internet communications.lotus39 wrote:
Well of course its over generalizing, there simply isnt enough evidence to say conclusivly if someone is or isnt.
Interesting though how many check marks you can put next to the average UO scammer, like I said Wrong is wrong, the only difference is you dont get prosecuted in UO and thats the justification.
Summary:Domnu wrote:The internet opens up a new behavioral environment. With purely symbolic inter-personal communications people are insulated from emotional norms and their behavior may qualify on a purely technical, diagnostic level, as socipathic, but those behavioral norms were not established through internet communications.lotus39 wrote:
Well of course its over generalizing, there simply isnt enough evidence to say conclusivly if someone is or isnt.
Interesting though how many check marks you can put next to the average UO scammer, like I said Wrong is wrong, the only difference is you dont get prosecuted in UO and thats the justification.
Careful about throwing jargon out there lotus. People can sometimes behave in a sociopathic way over the internet, but were you to meet them in person they may not be at all what you'd expect.
MatronDeWinter wrote:Summary:Domnu wrote:The internet opens up a new behavioral environment. With purely symbolic inter-personal communications people are insulated from emotional norms and their behavior may qualify on a purely technical, diagnostic level, as socipathic, but those behavioral norms were not established through internet communications.lotus39 wrote:
Well of course its over generalizing, there simply isnt enough evidence to say conclusivly if someone is or isnt.
Interesting though how many check marks you can put next to the average UO scammer, like I said Wrong is wrong, the only difference is you dont get prosecuted in UO and thats the justification.
Careful about throwing jargon out there lotus. People can sometimes behave in a sociopathic way over the internet, but were you to meet them in person they may not be at all what you'd expect.
When people have anonymity, they are more inclined to be jerks. Theres some interney law about this, but I forget what it's called.
MatronDeWinter wrote: Summary:
When people have anonymity, they are more inclined to be jerks. Theres some interney law about this, but I forget what it's called.
I agree. I consider most of you NPC's that inhabit the single player game that I am here to enjoy.Domnu wrote:MatronDeWinter wrote: Summary:
When people have anonymity, they are more inclined to be jerks. Theres some interney law about this, but I forget what it's called.
It's more than just anonymity, though. I think it has more to do with the inability of symbols to signify that you are interacting with another human being. Anonymity has inspired some people to do some incredibly compassionate things for other people, which doesn't really happen over the internet. The problem is that most of the time we don't actually see (and I'm using this in a figurative sense, not just a literal "using your eyeballs" way) the other people that we're interacting with over the internet, particularly in UO.
I'd call it something sort of like internet-induced solipsism.
MatronDeWinter wrote:It's John Gabriel's Greater Internet F___wad Theory.
(link has some bad language, so I didnt embed it as an image)
http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com ... Theory.jpg
The term "sociopath," as you defined it, is a clinical one; it has specific diagnostic characteristics that are useful in identifying treatment for particular pathological behaviors. Using psychological terms as a way to bully and demean other people just makes life harder on yourself and everyone else by throwing labels and judgments around. People do bad things when they play this game, and when they're on the internet. It doesn't help discourage that kind of behavior to just go around calling names.lotus39 wrote: however taking it off screen to chat programs and setting up someone to rip them off is just foul crap and anyone who does it is foul both in game and in RL.
Domnu wrote:The term "sociopath," as you defined it, is a clinical one; it has specific diagnostic characteristics that are useful in identifying treatment for particular pathological behaviors. Using psychological terms as a way to bully and demean other people just makes life harder on yourself and everyone else by throwing labels and judgments around. People do bad things when they play this game, and when they're on the internet. It doesn't help discourage that kind of behavior to just go around calling names.lotus39 wrote: however taking it off screen to chat programs and setting up someone to rip them off is just foul crap and anyone who does it is foul both in game and in RL.