Its people being anti social ****s that forced OSI's hand. If your business was losing custom due to people's behaviour, what would you do? Look at the subscription numbers, Trammel saved UO you idiot, but it also changed it, for the worst in most of our opinions obviously.dexter4321 wrote:Why do you think OSI failed in the end? Why do you think Trammel was invented? Why do you think OSI went down a road that it's only destination was it's inevitable destruction? It is things like this that created Trammel and ruined OSI.
Trammel was invented to attempt to maintain growth, which had plateaued, sitting at around 100,000 for months, by attempting to attract a different demographic, the only way to do that was provide what they thought people wanted, what many people left for EQ for, and that, for good or for worse, was happy flower land.
How did OSI fail? Because it changed what most of us liked, and subsequently doubled its user base? Funny definition of failure you have Josh, no wonder you think losing = winning. I hate what they did too, but it did work for nearly 3 years.