Sir Crapalot's Load **CANCELLED explanation inside**
Moderator: Trade Moderators
-
Capitalist
- Posts: 11567
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:39 pm
Re: Sir Crapalot's Load **CANCELLED explanation inside**
pak man bump
Denis the Menace wrote:Vega for me you are just exploiting the uosa system with your vanq charged spellreflect recall invis pink boobi pvp trammel style which never existed on osi, so stfu.
Jakob wrote:Regardless of douchebag, fair player or Vega.
-
Happy Gilmore
- Posts: 1048
- Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 6:10 pm
Re: Sir Crapalot's Load **CANCELLED explanation inside**
Sir Crap, I would like to buy that dead chicken from you for 10 million
Re: Sir Crapalot's Load **CANCELLED explanation inside**
Good times... good times.
[11:31] <@Vintirex-droid> Cause he wants to flirt like a 7 year old I'm out silver
[18:55] <Soma_> I would definitely go transginger for millions of doll hairs
Re: Sir Crapalot's Load **CANCELLED explanation inside**
so upset i missed it...
[16:18] <jaygee> theres a nobs born every day storx
[09:50] <Gandalf[7thson]> if you guys can't handle that everyone who plays this game isn't a greasy nerd with a fat wife then I dont know what to tell you guys
[09:50] <Gandalf[7thson]> if you guys can't handle that everyone who plays this game isn't a greasy nerd with a fat wife then I dont know what to tell you guys
Re: Sir Crapalot's Load **CANCELLED explanation inside**
Lets face it guys, what's more important? Pixels or players? The pixels will always be there, and be completely meaningless without players. You could start your own shard, be a GM, and have all the pixels, and would that be worth anything?
The population is what gives value, if you drive the population away through griefing you make those pixels you fought for worthless.
You already know this stuff. I've played on near death servers and watched a few people basically smother the weak flame through over aggressive play style. This server is hugely down in population, and this is UO, it probably wont gain another resurgence.
The population is what gives value, if you drive the population away through griefing you make those pixels you fought for worthless.
You already know this stuff. I've played on near death servers and watched a few people basically smother the weak flame through over aggressive play style. This server is hugely down in population, and this is UO, it probably wont gain another resurgence.
Catskills 97-99
Re: Sir Crapalot's Load **CANCELLED explanation inside**
This one entitled butt hurt rage quit does not hurt population. Redistribute those pixels to good homes and good riddance.
The game as of late is on an upswing. No. There most likely won't be 500 unique ips ever again. But if you want to chalk that up to over aggressive play style opposed to natural aging of this game and all of its ilk in general...go right ahead! Most of the active players here love this tune.
The game as of late is on an upswing. No. There most likely won't be 500 unique ips ever again. But if you want to chalk that up to over aggressive play style opposed to natural aging of this game and all of its ilk in general...go right ahead! Most of the active players here love this tune.
Inkognito●GM ProvocationLi Meiyang wrote:Banned for"trashtalking for no reason"
Inkognito was flamebaiting me with all the "no" stuff.WTF is that?
-
PorkTornado
- Posts: 723
- Joined: Wed Jun 26, 2013 3:31 pm
Re: Sir Crapalot's Load **CANCELLED explanation inside**
Did this fall?
-
Capitalist
- Posts: 11567
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:39 pm
Re: Sir Crapalot's Load **CANCELLED explanation inside**
I have the timer if you want to come.
Denis the Menace wrote:Vega for me you are just exploiting the uosa system with your vanq charged spellreflect recall invis pink boobi pvp trammel style which never existed on osi, so stfu.
Jakob wrote:Regardless of douchebag, fair player or Vega.