Non GF 1634's

Buying/Selling Rares

Moderator: Trade Moderators

Doogie
Posts: 85
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:45 am

Non GF 1634's

Post by Doogie »

S/B is 2.5 mill.
Last edited by Doogie on Sat Jan 31, 2015 4:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Doogie
Posts: 85
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:45 am

Re: Non GF 1634's

Post by Doogie »

up

User avatar
inkognito
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 1907
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:10 am

Re: Non GF 1634's

Post by inkognito »

I'm not overly experienced in sandals and their fluctuating rarity and popularity. But I think in this instance I would ask myself:
Are non blessed 1634's worth 1.5 million gold?
Image
Li Meiyang wrote:Banned for"trashtalking for no reason"
Inkognito was flamebaiting me with all the "no" stuff.WTF is that?
Inkognito●GM Provocation

User avatar
Hydroxide
UOSA Subscriber!
UOSA Subscriber!
Posts: 600
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 5:26 pm
Location: Under a Yew Tree

Re: Non GF 1634's

Post by Hydroxide »

He listed them as "non gf" not "unblessed"
Image

User avatar
PorkTornado
Posts: 723
Joined: Wed Jun 26, 2013 3:31 pm

Re: Non GF 1634's

Post by PorkTornado »

Hydroxide wrote:He listed them as "non gf" not "unblessed"
And how much does a CBD go for?

User avatar
Abyz
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 2310
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 4:54 pm

Re: Non GF 1634's

Post by Abyz »

.8 to 1 mil? Doesn't it cost and arm and a leg in silver to hue them this color though?
hoaxbusterscall.blogspot.com

Doogie
Posts: 85
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:45 am

Re: Non GF 1634's

Post by Doogie »

Please feel free to find another pair for sale.

User avatar
Soma
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 1023
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 9:40 pm

Re: Non GF 1634's

Post by Soma »

Cool hue, definitely worth the asking price.

I'd buy these if I didn't already have a pair of reds.
Please choose a more appropriate signature.

User avatar
inkognito
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 1907
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:10 am

Re: Non GF 1634's

Post by inkognito »

Ya actually I believe I was mistaken on these inparticular.
Can we get a pic?
Image
Li Meiyang wrote:Banned for"trashtalking for no reason"
Inkognito was flamebaiting me with all the "no" stuff.WTF is that?
Inkognito●GM Provocation

User avatar
Soma
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 1023
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 9:40 pm

Re: Non GF 1634's

Post by Soma »

Image
Please choose a more appropriate signature.

User avatar
Hydroxide
UOSA Subscriber!
UOSA Subscriber!
Posts: 600
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 5:26 pm
Location: Under a Yew Tree

Re: Non GF 1634's

Post by Hydroxide »

doogie, can you verify these are blessed, just not GF?

or are they unblessed

please clarify
Image

Doogie
Posts: 85
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:45 am

Re: Non GF 1634's

Post by Doogie »

They are blessed and in new condition.I never wear them.

Doogie
Posts: 85
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:45 am

Re: Non GF 1634's

Post by Doogie »

last bump

User avatar
Capitalist
Posts: 11567
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:39 pm

Re: Non GF 1634's

Post by Capitalist »

Teach me how to Doogie.
Denis the Menace wrote:Vega for me you are just exploiting the uosa system with your vanq charged spellreflect recall invis pink boobi pvp trammel style which never existed on osi, so stfu.
Jakob wrote:Regardless of douchebag, fair player or Vega.

User avatar
inkognito
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 1907
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:10 am

Re: Non GF 1634's

Post by inkognito »

This hue looks pretty sweet.
1,900,000 gold?
Image
Li Meiyang wrote:Banned for"trashtalking for no reason"
Inkognito was flamebaiting me with all the "no" stuff.WTF is that?
Inkognito●GM Provocation

Post Reply