Why not? Thats exactly what you had to do in T2A. I personaly remember in August 99 my bro finnaly got a deed and we spent 2 days running the map trying to place. Couldnt find one spot on GL.Biohazard wrote:You shouldn't have to camp an IDOC because the housing is not correct(when you factor how many accounts 1 person may have)
I see several positives from zero available housing space.
* Houses outside of prime locations will be worth more gold than the deed.
* Houses in prime locations will be that much more desirable.
* People will have a reason to find and camp IDOC`s, resulting in more PvP.
* People will have a reason to find and camp IDOC`s, a totally new way for players to make money.
* More reasons for camping IDOC`s creates a whole new class of players, IDOC Hunters(I was one on GL).
* Valuable Housing gives any player with a house in any location a reason to keep playing and refreshing that house.
* Housing creates a whole new reason to farm gold resulting in more dungeon activity. Example: Small house costs 200% more than a deed, Player has to spend time in dungeons acquiring more Gold than if the player could just purchase a deed and place anywhere in game.
PS. You say the housing situation "is not correct" because you think people shouldn't have 3 accounts and 15 potential houses.
Frankly that is a poor argument, People typically didn't have 3 accounts on OSI because they paid $10 per month.
Unless you want to pay $10 a month to derrick I don't suggest limiting accounts to one.
You cant just argue that we should be limited to either 1 account or 1 house per account.
No one was limited to 1 account on OSI nor should we be on here.
Having 3 houses total is a joke considering the 5 houses per account era accurate rule.
To even suggest that housing is currently over populated is a joke when you can still place keeps and towers on empty land.
