New LL Room Addition:

[Faust]

Would you please change it back to the old look without ledge blocks? I'm assuming the new addition is based on the Chessy version of the room. However, the majority of the production shards if not all besides chessy didn't have those blocks on the ledge. The blocks look horrible in my opinion and make this location more aggrivating than it already is with the era accurate LOS buggy area.

[Derrick]

The first two comments I got on this was that it looked a lot better.

Yes, I was going through the chessie pics this morning and noticed that difference and a few others.

I would respect the outcome of a poll on this.

[Faust]

Fixed by adding the poll Derrick.

[BlackFoot]

I never saw those on atlantic or great lakes where I playd so I vote no blocks!

[Karik Verlee]

Im a chessie player so I had to vote yes. Its the way it was to me!

[Faust]

I completely understand and respect any chessy player that would want to keep it for some personal nolstagic reason based on their old shard. I would be the same way if this was my shard if the situation was reversed. I just think the majority of the players that enjoy era accuracy that didn't play on chessy would agree with me though.

We shall see with the results.

[MatronDeWinter]

For those too lazy to go check it out...

LLblocks.jpg (168.13 KiB) Viewed 3002 times

Now that I see it, I recall block like this as well. Though I never once played on Chessy, so my recollection must have came from Pacific and/or Siege.

I could just be remembering things from other pictures or whatever though, or even made it all up in my head!

[Karik Verlee]

I just remembered that when I first got on this shard I thought it was odd how they werent there.

[Sandro]

looks fine

[iamreallysquall]

i vote yes as a ex chessy/siege player

[Joueur Moyen]

I voted no. It wasn't on Cats, and I don't remember it on Atlantic.

[Buckaroo Banzai]

Chessy - Yes!

[aXe]

I vote no, LOS is already bad in that location.

[Pro]

just keep em room is already too easy to escape from the blockers help a little bit >:[

[iamreallysquall]

need more yes looks so much better