Dragons
-
Dupre[THG]
- Posts: 277
- Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:39 pm
Dragons
They did not have high magery at all thats the whole point of getting a white wyrm because white wyrms hadhigh magery and no firebreath and Dragons had low magery but firebreath which made up for it. so im pretty sure this is correct.
Lord Dupre , Leader Of The Guard
Lord Of Trinsic.
Lord Of Trinsic.
Re: Dragons
Yea that is true, unless the dragon script was edited their starting magery is around 39.4 - 41.5.. as opposed to 88 - 93 for the wyrm.
-
Dupre[THG]
- Posts: 277
- Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:39 pm
Re: Dragons
Why are you bumping this? It not a question. How does this apply to second age?Dupre[THG] wrote:bump
-
Dupre[THG]
- Posts: 277
- Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:39 pm
Re: Dragons
hehe, cause on second age magery on dragons is HIGH and thats the difference of wyrms and dragonsDerrick wrote:Why are you bumping this? It not a question. How does this apply to second age?Dupre[THG] wrote:bump
Lord Dupre , Leader Of The Guard
Lord Of Trinsic.
Lord Of Trinsic.
Re: Dragons
This is true, I was digging through some of my old books and I came across my old "Prima's official strategy guide - Ultima online The second age" which I bought in 1998Dupre[THG] wrote:They did not have high magery at all thats the whole point of getting a white wyrm because white wyrms hadhigh magery and no firebreath and Dragons had low magery but firebreath which made up for it. so I'm pretty sure this is correct.
It has a monster/beast compendium and I scanned the page with the dragons on it
Re: Dragons
When will the useless regs like "Dragons Blood" be in?
The First Player Of UO Second Age.
Re: Dragons
never...