tactics and macing

For ideas on how to make Second Age a better shard. Can it get any better? Maybe.
Forum rules
Posts in this forum are expected to be constructive, realistic and civil. Inflamatory or off topic posts will be removed.
Post Reply
monkey555
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 10:34 pm

tactics and macing

Post by monkey555 »

I am at 90 macing and 70 tactics, when I remember that tactics was the fastest to raise back in the day. Everyone was gm warrior prior to being gm anything else on their paper doll.

Another thing, it doesnt seem that maces drains alot of stamina, which it used to do like crazy back in the day. I know, you might say well maybe whoever you fought had red pots, not true, ima thief I snooped every single one of my oponents, all of them ran without problems and no pots...
Also it used to destroy armor like crazy, which I am not sure if its on this shard, just throwing that out there.

Mephistopheles
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 631
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 3:55 am
Location: The 9th Circle of Hell

Re: tactics and macing

Post by Mephistopheles »

The fact that you're not GMed in either of your dexxing skills is the reason why you're not necessarily draining people's stam like crazy. What kind of weapon were you using? Q-Staffs are the most effective from what I've seen. From what I recall, Tactics was always the slowest to gain.
Image

At least change the angle so people can't see where my characters are. Fire/IPBan anyone who plays my characters too plz. KThxBai.

monkey555
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 10:34 pm

Re: tactics and macing

Post by monkey555 »

No, Ive killed other players and they were still runing so missing has nothing to do with my judgement. No, you remember incorrectly, tactics was allways first to gm. It always at least raised side by side with fighting skills.

ClowN
Posts: 638
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 4:58 pm

Re: tactics and macing

Post by ClowN »

you are right about tactics being the first to GM on OSI. i mentioned this a while ago but no one else seemed to agree. i definatly remember what you are talking about tho. however i dont think its an issue with tactics gaining to slowly here, i think the fighting skills might just be raising to fast. i can GM tactics and weapon skill in about 8 hours or so macroing on a trapped wandering healer. you definatly couldnt GM either skill in 8 hours on OSI.

Naljier
Posts: 506
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 3:17 pm

Re: tactics and macing

Post by Naljier »

correctamundo about the tactics, on old osi t2a you used to see alot of GM 'warriors' (tactics)

but seeing a GM 'swordsman' (swords) was extremely rare

so it follows that tactics always beat swords/mace/fencing to 100

Hoots
UOSA Subscriber!
UOSA Subscriber!
Posts: 1170
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 3:07 pm

Re: tactics and macing

Post by Hoots »

from my memory it was always GM warrior first. I remember being GM warrior for weeks before getting the last couple points of swords on OSI.

Regardless, the key to raising tactics is hitting things... duh right, but what im saying is remember to raise a weapon skill quickly you need to spare someone with your skill level or higher. If you want to raise tacts, hit someone with 0 wrestling or a 0 skill in the weapon they are holding.... You will hit them 90% of the time so your tacts will go up much quicker!. (But you wont gain any weapon skill doing this.)

User avatar
Faust
Posts: 6247
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 7:01 pm

Re: tactics and macing

Post by Faust »

UO Stratics '99 - http://www.uosecondage.com/stratics/arms.html wrote: * Maces do an extra damage of 3 to 5 points to the victims stamina if a hit is made. Maces also do damage to armor everytime the armor absorbs damage. The amount of damage done to armor is half that of the damage points absorbed by the armor and typically lies in the 1 - 7 points range.

Eulogy
Posts: 481
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 1:28 am

Re: tactics and macing

Post by Eulogy »

I remember armor breaking via macing a lot more than I see here.
At one point, a war hammer could break a shield that someone with decent parry skill carried in no time.
Image

ClowN
Posts: 638
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 4:58 pm

Re: tactics and macing

Post by ClowN »

Eulogy wrote:I remember armor breaking via macing a lot more than I see here.
At one point, a war hammer could break a shield that someone with decent parry skill carried in no time.

my memory tells me the same

Kraarug
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 2:46 pm

Re: tactics and macing

Post by Kraarug »

I think the difference between here and OSI is how we gain GM melee.

Fighting something like an Order guard gives fast melee skill but, because the damage to the target is lower due to their higher weapon skill, tactics will drag behind.

I suspect that if you fought a player who had the same combat skills one would gain tactics first here.

I dont know, just a thought.
Image

ClowN
Posts: 638
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 4:58 pm

Re: tactics and macing

Post by ClowN »

Kraarug wrote:I think the difference between here and OSI is how we gain GM melee.

Fighting something like an Order guard gives fast melee skill but, because the damage to the target is lower due to their higher weapon skill, tactics will drag behind.

I suspect that if you fought a player who had the same combat skills one would gain tactics first here.

I dont know, just a thought.

tried this with my first 2 chars i made on this server. both were 30 weapon skill and 30 tactics starting out the macro, and both were GMed in their weapon skills WAY before tactics was in the 90s.

User avatar
Arkon
UOSA Subscriber!
UOSA Subscriber!
Posts: 248
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 6:02 am
Location: In your house stealing your stuff.

Re: tactics and macing

Post by Arkon »

The tactics gain here is far slower than it ever was on OSI. When I first started training up my fencing and tactics on my dexxer here, I was GM fencing while still around ~82 tactics. It then took a few days of on and off again training it to hit GM.

My mage GM'd wrestling while getting tactics to roughly ~77. Now swords is 85 (from 30) while tactics is at 82.

As for the macing goes, I don't have a macer, but I was fighting one the other day (pk) while on my dexxer and he did a substantial amount of stamina damage but not much in the way of armor damage. My armor was already pretty banged up prior to fighting him and after 10 mins of fighting back and forth I still had all my pieces. It's not the way I remembered it.
"If you want an image of the future, imagine a bag of milk being poured on a human face--forever."

User avatar
Derrick
Posts: 9004
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 7:49 pm
Location: Cove
Contact:

Re: tactics and macing

Post by Derrick »

Looking at both of these issues. Thanks.

Zigo-U-
Posts: 82
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 5:38 pm

Re: tactics and macing

Post by Zigo-U- »

Yup, Tactics was always first to gm at the ol bonewall.

User avatar
Faust
Posts: 6247
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 7:01 pm

Re: tactics and macing

Post by Faust »

A possible thought for mace dealing armor damage... Perhaps the regular weapon damage to armor stacked with the additional value that maces dealt to the value. I don't know how exactly it works on here but a possible thought towards the issue. Also, I know specific types of creatures would hit more often on a specific piece of armor. For example, a sewer rat would hit more so on the feet than anywhere else. Human on human should be no different hitting specific pieces more so than the other resulting in that piece taking the blunt of the damage in return being destroyed much quicker.

Post Reply