Is the pvp better now then before?

Topics related to Second Age
Post Reply

Is the pvp better now then before?

Yes
35
45%
No
42
55%
 
Total votes: 77

SPANKY
Posts: 298
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 3:16 pm
Location: Mount Olympus
Contact:

Re: Is the pvp better now then before?

Post by SPANKY »

son wrote:Mages got screwed big time on this change :(

Its also pretty hilarious you douches would dis the shard's current #1 pvper :(
Sin Cloud wrote: we die on purpose to laugh at your lil pride trips ya'll do. lol
+ -
https://www.twitch.tv/sirifps

User avatar
rouss
Posts: 414
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 12:16 pm

Re: Is the pvp better now then before?

Post by rouss »

son wrote:Mages got screwed big time on this change :( :(
how got they screwed? stop spamming and that's it. that's the way it was back in the time and actually is on OSI now. there has always been a delay, even on uosa, before spring 2009. havent you noticed?
Chesapeake Nov. 1998 — July 2000
Second Age Feb. 2009 —

Fede
Posts: 741
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 12:23 am

Re: Is the pvp better now then before?

Post by Fede »

son wrote:Mages got screwed big time on this change

Its also pretty hilarious you douches would dis the shard's current #1 pvper
You are absolutely right Felix. It's what I have been saying all along. Spanky and I have been dueling a lot recently, and we feel as if the everyone is put on the same playing field now. Their is no more competitive advantage.

You will recognize, individuals who are in favor of the change are the same individuals who are not as talented and die often.
rouss wrote:how got they screwed? stop spamming and that's it. that's the way it was back in the time and actually is on OSI now. there has always been a delay, even on uosa, before spring 2009. havent you noticed?
Their are still spamming opportunities.

Mazer
Posts: 345
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 7:05 pm

Re: Is the pvp better now then before?

Post by Mazer »

Iced Earth wrote:
Mazer wrote:
Iced Earth wrote:More will leave as the pvp improves? That's strange.
Apparently there is a difference of opinion as to what 'improvement of pvp' actually is. However, it seems more people feel this is a bad change even if it is accurate. Get your head out of the sand.
Whatever goober smooch. We know what YOU like(Divinitys retard mode spam button synch-only pvp) so you're opinion really isn't worth shit? Because divinity is awful?
Don't be upset b/c your opinion of what's "good" doesn't match up with 3/5 of the people responding to this thread. Open your eyes. You pretty much ignore any points I brought up in that other long-ass thread and go straight to the Faust defense of bashing other shards with inaccurate albeit more competitive PvP. It's sad you're still doing this.

Also, listen to your dexxer buddy:
Psilo wrote:This isn't trash talk, please take your negativity back to that forum! Why insult people for having an opinion?

Thank you sire :!:
Thanks brotatoe.

User avatar
Faust
Posts: 6247
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 7:01 pm

Re: Is the pvp better now then before?

Post by Faust »

Iced Earth wrote:
Mazer wrote:
Iced Earth wrote:More will leave as the pvp improves? That's strange.
Apparently there is a difference of opinion as to what 'improvement of pvp' actually is. However, it seems more people feel this is a bad change even if it is accurate. Get your head out of the sand.
Whatever goober smooch. We know what YOU like(Divinitys retard mode spam button synch-only pvp) so you're opinion really isn't worth shit? Because divinity is awful?
Divinity's pvp was influenced immensely by +- and it's no surprise he would defend it to be honest. However, if you take a look at the numbers on Divinity it clearly shows you how bad it really is in reality. Go from a 500/1000+ pop average to a pathetic 10-30 figure in no time. The PvP mechanics was pretty much if not entirely static the entire time during the decline period. If the mechanics were so great people would have continued to play no matter what was done. At least it's amusing when people use this argument for the reason Div failed though... :wink:

User avatar
Derrick
Posts: 9004
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 7:49 pm
Location: Cove
Contact:

Re: Is the pvp better now then before?

Post by Derrick »

This is turning into a trash talk thread fast. Let's try to accept the differences in opinion here and also try not to bring other shards into it.
Image
"The text in this article or section may be incoherent or very hard to understand, and should be reworded if the intended meaning can be determined."

Fede
Posts: 741
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 12:23 am

Re: Is the pvp better now then before?

Post by Fede »

I ask all the individuals posting in this thread to not allow this to move into the trash talking thread.

Their could have been 1,000 reasons why the other t2a shard had such a large spike of people leave.

User avatar
Psilo
Posts: 1411
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 12:41 pm

Re: Is the pvp better now then before?

Post by Psilo »

SPANKY wrote:
son wrote:Mages got screwed big time on this change :(

Its also pretty hilarious you douches would dis the shard's current #1 pvper :(
There's no "#1" pvper.

And by the way, I would have never even known a guy named Spanky even existed if it wasn't for tourney messages.

I never see him in-game, he only plays trammel. Who cares if he leaves? Who cares if Sandro leaves? The majority of this shard hasn't even heard of these players, they are never seen in the sandbox world called "Brittania" and "t2a".

Even if they leave there are plenty of pks that will keep the dungeons interesting with or without inactive guilds like cr3w or what have you.

You guys just don't like 1999 pvp, accept it and move on. Go play COD:Modern Warfare 2, sounds like your type of game /sarcasm

Fede
Posts: 741
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 12:23 am

Re: Is the pvp better now then before?

Post by Fede »

Psilo wrote:There's no "#1" pvper.

And by the way, I would have never even known a guy named Spanky even existed if it wasn't for tourney messages.

I never see him in-game, he only plays trammel. Who cares if he leaves? Who cares if Sandro leaves? The majority of this shard hasn't even heard of these players, they are never seen in the sandbox world called "Brittania" and "t2a".

Even if they leave there are plenty of pks that will keep the dungeons interesting with or without inactive guilds like cr3w or what have you.

You guys just don't like 1999 pvp, accept it and move on. Go play COD:Modern Warfare 2, sounds like your type of game /sarcasm
But their is a group of us that win a lot. The same group that doesn't like the changes made. Obviously we do like 1999 pvp, or else none of us would have started playing this shard. Now that the shard changed, we don't like it anymore.

benny-
Posts: 341
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 8:58 am

Re: Is the pvp better now then before?

Post by benny- »

Fede wrote: But their is a group of us that win a lot. The same group that doesn't like the changes made. Obviously we do like 1999 pvp, or else none of us would have started playing this shard. Now that the shard changed, we don't like it anymore.

The changes made were original game mechanics from T2A that have been implemented here....This is why I don't understand this sudden outcry and a half dozen threats of leaving the server over this recent change. So you like 99 pvp but you're upset that the server has made a change to be more like 99...?


This server aims to replicate the T2A era, not offer customized pvp mechanics to accommodate the preferences of a minority of players. If you like t2a mechanics, great...everyday this server is getting more and more like the era. If you want mechanics that weren't a part of the era.....Sorry?
- Elisud

User avatar
Faust
Posts: 6247
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 7:01 pm

Re: Is the pvp better now then before?

Post by Faust »

Wow, benny that sounds a lot like..

Sure proud of my little Fausties... :wink:

User avatar
Downs
Posts: 4102
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 3:34 pm

Re: Is the pvp better now then before?

Post by Downs »

benny- wrote: This server aims to replicate the T2A era, not offer customized pvp mechanics to accommodate the preferences of a minority of players. If you like t2a mechanics, great...everyday this server is getting more and more like the era. If you want mechanics that weren't a part of the era.....Sorry?
That pretty much sums it up. Us thieves got hit hard by that patch that nerfed stealth, but w/e it's era accurate, which is why 99% of us play here.

UO wasn't exactly a balanced game of strategy and tactics. IDK why the hardcore pvpers expect it to be
Image
RoadKill wrote: "cA" is a guild of trickery, thieves and explosives so be wary around them.
The New Yew Bank Mall! Don't bother shopping anwhere else!
cA's Database of Adventures!!!

User avatar
Faust
Posts: 6247
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 7:01 pm

Re: Is the pvp better now then before?

Post by Faust »

Downs wrote: UO wasn't exactly a balanced game of strategy and tactics. IDK why the hardcore pvpers expect it to be
That is all they know and what ever single shard has tried to accomplish with having nothing but failure for every single one.

No shard to date has strived for an era accurate path for this era. Servers that have no direction or objective is on a clock that is ticking until the expiration date. There are no bias, no special interest groups, or any minority that comes before the next. The mechanics are depicted by history and that alone. Balance for any particular area means nothing.

User avatar
MatronDeWinter
UOSA Donor!!
UOSA Donor!!
Posts: 7249
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:35 am
Location: 你的錢包

Re: Is the pvp better now then before?

Post by MatronDeWinter »

Faust wrote:
Downs wrote: UO wasn't exactly a balanced game of strategy and tactics. IDK why the hardcore pvpers expect it to be
That is all they know and what ever single shard has tried to accomplish with having nothing but failure for every single one.

No shard to date has strived for an era accurate path for this era. Servers that have no direction or objective is on a clock that is ticking until the expiration date. There are no bias, no special interest groups, or any minority that comes before the next. The mechanics are depicted by history and that alone. Balance for any particular area means nothing.
I commend you good sir, entirely agree!
FaustPHD.jpg
FaustPHD.jpg (170.54 KiB) Viewed 2196 times

User avatar
Psilo
Posts: 1411
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 12:41 pm

Re: Is the pvp better now then before?

Post by Psilo »

Fede wrote:
Psilo wrote:There's no "#1" pvper.

And by the way, I would have never even known a guy named Spanky even existed if it wasn't for tourney messages.

I never see him in-game, he only plays trammel. Who cares if he leaves? Who cares if Sandro leaves? The majority of this shard hasn't even heard of these players, they are never seen in the sandbox world called "Brittania" and "t2a".

Even if they leave there are plenty of pks that will keep the dungeons interesting with or without inactive guilds like cr3w or what have you.

You guys just don't like 1999 pvp, accept it and move on. Go play COD:Modern Warfare 2, sounds like your type of game /sarcasm
But their is a group of us that win a lot. The same group that doesn't like the changes made. Obviously we do like 1999 pvp, or else none of us would have started playing this shard. Now that the shard changed, we don't like it anymore.

Understood, I respect your opinion.

What's annoying me though is "top pvpers" making threats like "we're gonna take everyone with us". That kinda negativity isn't cool IMO.

Post Reply